- Joined
- Oct 14, 2013
- Messages
- 1,919
- Reaction Score
- 4,706
USF gave us the closest game (other than Stanford) this year. Does the committee want to make sure one of us doesn't get to the FF?
Zorro said:Why is Chatanooga not only in the LV's bracket but gets them in the second game?
But USF would have a great chance at FF in any other bracket.Um, even the most paranoid committee-hating weirdomaniac has to absolutely love USF's position. They were given a gift, as a 6-seed hosting with booted-from-home Louisville in the place where the FF is going to be played. Bulls' fans should be pumped, and the Cards fans have a lot to be disgruntled about, but hey, now that they have run off to the ACC they can see that the committee has as little love for them as ever.
If the Bulls take homecourt advantage and then kock off KY (definite possibility) then we can start talking about the AAC getting the Cards treatment. But all in all, very nice.
The reason USF is in our part of the bracket is to ensure no more than one AAC team can participate in the final 4. If by some chance USF made it to the final 4, from another region, the Power 5 and NCAA would have looked very stupid. As it stands now, they are just plain old stupid.
Um, even the most paranoid committee-hating weirdomaniac has to absolutely love USF's position. They were given a gift, as a 6-seed hosting with booted-from-home Louisville in the place where the FF is going to be played. Bulls' fans should be pumped, and the Cards fans have a lot to be disgruntled about, but hey, now that they have run off to the ACC they can see that the committee has as little love for them as ever.
If the Bulls take homecourt advantage and then kock off KY (definite possibility) then we can start talking about the AAC getting the Cards treatment. But all in all, very nice.
The reason USF is in our part of the bracket is to ensure no more than one AAC team can participate in the final 4. If by some chance USF made it to the final 4, from another region, the Power 5 and NCAA would have looked very stupid. As it stands now, they are just plain old stupid.
Your answer isn't particularly responsive to the question. Guaranteed UConn avoidance has nothing to do with why two teams from the same conference end up in the same region. USF didn't need guaranteed avoidance to be placed in a different region than a conference mate they've already faced 3 times when only 3 conference teams made the tourney. Pretty easy to send them to different regions or put then second and third best teams in the same region away from the best, or the first and third best together but away from the second best. Why put the two best in the same region. I'm not saying there's a conspiracy to eliminate AAC teams earlier than necessary but if there were, this is the way to do it.USF is in that spot where the losses don't look bad but the wins don't look great. Their good wins are Oklahoma and Chattanooga. Then 3 over a bubble team in Tulane. Not enough to get you the top 4 seed that guarantees UCONN avoidance.
Really? This is just paranoia. No, USF does not have a "great chance" to get to the FF. #6 seeds get to the FF once in a pink and blue moon. It does allow them a solid chance of getting to the S16, maybe even the E8, which would be really cool.But USF would have a great chance at FF in any other bracket.
If this conference's hope to survive rests on women's basketball we're in trouble.The Power 5 conferences are on a mission to take over all of college sports. Any momentum the AAC is trying to get to survive is going to be attempted to be stifled. 2 sure fire men's teams from the league were denied the chance to even compete, SMU last year and Temple this year. All of the men's teams were under seeded and stacked in the same region last season.
And I'm sure USF, if they beat Louisville, are thrilled with the task of facing UConn again as opposed to say South Carolina or Maryland. Just thrilled. USF earned the right to host the second their bid was approved. To act like they were given a favor by hosting is disengenuous.
I have no idea if USF loses to LSU or makes it to the Elite 8. If a league is fighting for survival and your putting it's 2 top teams in the same region after meeting 3 times it's either very lazy or deliberate.
Right, but you obviously mean that any chance of survival depends on field hockey, and we (UConn and the AAC) have got that nailed down too.If this conference's hope to survive rests on women's basketball we're in trouble.
Really? This is just paranoia. No, USF does not have a "great chance" to get to the FF. #6 seeds get to the FF once in a pink and blue moon. It does allow them a solid chance of getting to the S16, maybe even the E8, which would be really cool.
Um, so when does Geno play against #6 seeds in the E8? Shall we say never? But do grumple on because I'm sure someone needs to counteract the pure joy that Jose is feeling with his lot.Yeah where they would have to face their conference foe they faced 3 times already and happens to be a dynasty that has made the Final 4 7 straight years.
Geno disagrees with you not surprisingly.
Um, so when does Geno play against #6 seeds in the E8? Shall we say never? But do grumple on because I'm sure someone needs to counteract the pure joy that Jose is feeling with his lot.
Geno spouts off about many things including how Stewie doesn't have a clue about how to play defense, and you are free to believe them if you are in that state of metal impairment.
Your answer isn't particularly responsive to the question. Guaranteed UConn avoidance has nothing to do with why two teams from the same conference end up in the same region. USF didn't need guaranteed avoidance to be placed in a different region than a conference mate they've already faced 3 times when only 3 conference teams made the tourney. Pretty easy to send them to different regions or put then second and third best teams in the same region away from the best, or the first and third best together but away from the second best. Why put the two best in the same region. I'm not saying there's a conspiracy to eliminate AAC teams earlier than necessary but if there were, this is the way to do it.
We have a lot of paranoid committee hating weirdomaniac's that are trolling the board tonight. I can't fathom why you think this is some good thing. USF had a chance to help the AAC show that there are some pretty darn good teams here other than UConn and make some noise in another bracket. They didn't necessarily need some home court advantage to get through the first two rounds. Instead, assuming the world doesn't end and UConn dispatches them for the 3rd time when they meet again, USF will have gotten little or no respect and people will poo poo the first two rounds as simply a mediocre team having home court advantage. Everyone loses with that. How you can construe that as a good thing is totally beyond me.Um, even the most paranoid committee-hating weirdomaniac has to absolutely love USF's position. They were given a gift, as a 6-seed hosting with booted-from-home Louisville in the place where the FF is going to be played. Bulls' fans should be pumped, and the Cards fans have a lot to be disgruntled about, but hey, now that they have run off to the ACC they can see that the committee has as little love for them as ever.
If the Bulls take homecourt advantage and then kock off KY (definite possibility) then we can start talking about the AAC getting the Cards treatment. But all in all, very nice.
In the EXTREMELY unlikely event that UConn and USF meet in the Elite 8 game, that will be a huge coup for the AAC. It would mean that two of the last eight teams in the tournament are from that minor, disrespected conference. The 6-seed from that conference would have had to beat two teams from the SEC including the 3rd best team in that conference, and also the 3rd best team in the ACC, to get there. After that feat, no reasonable person could disrespect the AAC, at least in women's basketball.
But of course there is only a tiny chance (1% or less) that a fourth Huskies - Bulls meeting will occur. That is why this whole subject is a tempest in a teapot.
But less of a coup than the also unlikely event of having them meet in the FF or championship.In the EXTREMELY unlikely event that UConn and USF meet in the Elite 8 game, that will be a huge coup for the AAC.
Totally corrected, once every six years then, when the other times it's been #2 seeds with an occasional #3.Wow. You seem really sure of yourself on that.
They faced #6 seed Arizona State in the Elite 8 in Trenton in 2009. Not that long ago.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_NCAA_Women's_Division_I_Basketball_Tournament
Geno is in a state of mental impairment because he thinks it's silly to have the 2 best teams from the conference in the same region? Ok.