Tremont Waters | Page 12 | The Boneyard

Tremont Waters

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 2, 2016
Messages
4,557
Reaction Score
58,269
This is what I find so bizarre. Kemba didn't play any 30 minutes a game as a freshman. Yet he still made the all rookie team. There was a time when many freshmen didn't expect to play much at all. We aren't playing 3 guards for the whole game, or even half of it on most nights. There's a total of about 100 minutes to go around, give or take.

What Waters should be thinking about is that UConn is known for running a 2 PG offense, and that Adams is likely gone after this year. That leaves him and Gilbert running the show and getting plenty of time. He also has a chance to simply beat out Gilbert or that Gilbert will injure himself again (or be limited in time due to injury).

I agree 100%, but I think when you consider the conference situation, performance last season, and current recruiting situation I'm taking a very conservative approach in estimating what it will take to land Tremont Waters. I Bleed Blue but the guy I talk to a lot on the recruiting scene just from their personal opinion (not from talking to Tremont) doesn't think 25 MPG will be enough. It's just someone opining and as others have mentioned with him backing away from Georgetown, Kansas not being interested, Duke likely getting Duval, Indiana IDK, Ollie could land on 25 MPG which would be much easier to accommodate.
 
Joined
Jan 30, 2015
Messages
4,270
Reaction Score
35,287
Jalen does have the length to guard college 3s, FYI. His wingspan isn't far from what DHam's was. I'd expect a heavy dose of 3 guard lineups no matter what.

Considering that injuries happen so frequently and players miss time, each of these 4 guards averaging 25-30 MPG is definitely feasible. But I think that winning would cure most of those type of complaints as is.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
5,113
Reaction Score
12,219
No chance. Not with small guards. Larrier and Polley will see minutes at the 3.
We started with RP at SF last year, I know bigger, and we can still pick up a bigger SG, like the one from OSU. I'm not sold that Polley will see alot of minutes next year as he still seems to be a little bit removed talent wise from starting for us. Unfortunately we will have to play small with the talent we have on board. We will be fine with a smaller guard at the SF. I'm sure we will play some zone to help offset it when we are getting abused by a bigger player. I just don't see TW coming here unless we are going to play a lot of 3 guard lineups.
 

nomar

#1 Casual Fan™
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
15,802
Reaction Score
43,431
Ugh. Tell me the elite programs recruiting him to start.

Duke, obviously.

Seriously, he'll have his chances to play big minutes at UConn. We'll play a ton of 3-guard lineups.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,395
Reaction Score
5,903
I agree 100%, but I think when you consider the conference situation, performance last season, and current recruiting situation I'm taking a very conservative approach in estimating what it will take to land Tremont Waters. I Bleed Blue but the guy I talk to a lot on the recruiting scene just from their personal opinion (not from talking to Tremont) doesn't think 25 MPG will be enough. It's just someone opining and as others have mentioned with him backing away from Georgetown, Kansas not being interested, Duke likely getting Duval, Indiana IDK, Ollie could land on 25 MPG which would be much easier to accommodate.

Stupid is always possible. But if you're picking your team -- or your advisors are -- based on your calculation of how many minutes a game you will get beyond will I or won't I get time on the court regularly at all -- you really are a lunatic. You don't know yet how well you will adjust to college and college ball, you don't know what last minute arrivals and departures of players will occur, you don't know who will be hurt, who will be better than expected and who will be worse than expected. Plus, no coach can be any good without looking at what you have in October and early NOvember and only committing to even a tentative design on what your team will look like then.

It's a fantasy if you think you know you will get 20 minutes at UConn versus 25 at Providence. If you're that smart don't waste time practicing basketball and just move to Vegas.
 

HuskyHawk

The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
32,200
Reaction Score
83,033
We started with RP at SF last year, I know bigger, and we can still pick up a bigger SG, like the one from OSU. I'm not sold that Polley will see alot of minutes next year as he still seems to be a little bit removed talent wise from starting for us. Unfortunately we will have to play small with the talent we have on board. We will be fine with a smaller guard at the SF. I'm sure we will play some zone to help offset it when we are getting abused by a bigger player. I just don't see TW coming here unless we are going to play a lot of 3 guard lineups.

Much depends on if we can land another Big, and what we see from Cobb and Diarra. I don't think we really want Larrier at the 4 more than 10 minutes a game. We might have to. Polley is a 4* just like Waters (yes, lower down in the rankings, whatever those are worth) and will absolutely play if he can defend. I think he's going to surprise people, and is probably underrated.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
12,580
Reaction Score
67,237
This is what I find so bizarre. Kemba didn't play any 30 minutes a game as a freshman. Yet he still made the all rookie team. There was a time when many freshmen didn't expect to play much at all. We aren't playing 3 guards for the whole game, or even half of it on most nights. There's a total of about 100 minutes to go around, give or take.

People will tolerate more to win and be a part of a winning program. Simple as that. Kemba's freshman team was a F4 team that went 27-3 in regular season Big East play. Top 50 freshman aren't going to want to sit on the bench of a middle of the pack AAC team.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
5,113
Reaction Score
12,219
Much depends on if we can land another Big, and what we see from Cobb and Diarra. I don't think we really want Larrier at the 4 more than 10 minutes a game. We might have to. Polley is a 4* just like Waters (yes, lower down in the rankings, whatever those are worth) and will absolutely play if he can defend. I think he's going to surprise people, and is probably underrated.
I'm wondering why so many fans are obsessed with a tradition lineup consisting of having a bruiser at the PF position in college basketball. Even in the pros there are mostly tall guys that play outside at the 4. We will be fine with TL at the PF and we have Diarra and Polley to back him up there if needed. I'm most worried about is the center position. We do need someone who can rebound and right now I don't think we have that on the team or people that we are looking at as grad transfers.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,395
Reaction Score
5,903
People will tolerate more to win and be a part of a winning program. Simple as that. Kemba's freshman team was a F4 team that went 27-3 in regular season Big East play. Top 50 freshman aren't going to want to sit on the bench of a middle of the pack AAC team.

If you have yourself stuck on the bench as a freshman on a middle of the pack AAC team, you weren't near being one of the 50 best freshmen in the country. If you were, the coach would find minutes for you.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,395
Reaction Score
5,903
I'm wondering why so many fans are obsessed with a tradition lineup consisting of having a bruiser at the PF position in college basketball. Even in the pros there are mostly tall guys that play outside at the 4. We will be fine with TL at the PF and we have Diarra and Polley to back him up there if needed. Now center is the position I'm most worried about. We do need someone who can rebound and right now I don't think we have that on the team or people that we are looking at as grad transfers.

It's a better question if you look at the 4s we've won championships with. They were Kevin Freeman, Josh Boone, Roscoe Smith and Deandre Daniels. Boone was a bruiser -- an old style 4. The other three viewed themselves as perimeter forwards and would have loved to have spent more time hanging out at the 3 point line if the coaches would have let them. As did, to varying degrees, Nadav and Donyell.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,272
Reaction Score
35,922
I'm wondering why so many fans are obsessed with a tradition lineup consisting of having a bruiser at the PF position in college basketball. Even in the pros there are mostly tall guys that play outside at the 4. We will be fine with TL at the PF and we have Diarra and Polley to back him up there if needed. I'm most worried about is the center position. We do need someone who can rebound and right now I don't think we have that on the team or people that we are looking at as grad transfers.

Along these lines, why not think of it as us imposing a matchup problem on the other team and forcing them to adapt, if we have 3 guys who can break you down off the dribble, plus a lengthy, triple threat guy at the 4?

For all that we talk about JC's teams imposing their will during a game, lately our MO has been to sit back and wait to get punched in the mouth and then adapt. We should be the aggressor.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
5,113
Reaction Score
12,219
Along these lines, why not think of it as us imposing a matchup problem on the other team and forcing them to adapt, if we have 3 guys who can break you down off the dribble, plus a lengthy, triple threat guy at the 4?

For all that we talk about JC's teams imposing their will during a game, lately our MO has been to sit back and wait to get punched in the mouth and then adapt. We should be the aggressor.
I agree! It would be great to have 4 really good offensive players who can dish and shoot on the floor at the same time.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,272
Reaction Score
35,922
It's a better question if you look at the 4s we've won championships with. They were Kevin Freeman, Josh Boone, Roscoe Smith and Deandre Daniels. Boone was a bruiser -- an old style 4. The other three viewed themselves as perimeter forwards and would have loved to have spent more time hanging out at the 3 point line if the coaches would have let them. As did, to varying degrees, Nadav and Donyell.

To be fair, we also had great success with CV/Boone or Boone/Armstrong at the 4, as well as Jeff Adrien, guys whose game was largely confined to the paint.

But I agree that trends in basketball have moved away from that towards the Roscoe/DD type of 4, something that JC was stubborn/slow to adapt to. KO was forced into it by circumstances, to great early success, though I think at this point it largely fits the style he wants to run. One of the best players of the KO era was Shonn Miller, who I think is the perfect college 4. Intelligent and crafty around the rim, can rebound, but can also shoot from the perimeter.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
12,580
Reaction Score
67,237
If you have yourself stuck on the bench as a freshman on a middle of the pack AAC team, you weren't near being one of the 50 best freshmen in the country. If you were, the coach would find minutes for you.

The threshold we were discussing was 30+ minutes per game, a bit more than finding minutes for you. It's basically getting starter minutes. Which depending on the situation, might not be possible for a freshman in a stacked position if the lineup has deficiencies elsewhere. Which is exactly UConn's situation. Which is why most recruits would balk at committing to a situation like that. Which is presumably one of the unsaid reasons MAL decommitted and is what might still keep Waters from coming.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2013
Messages
2,623
Reaction Score
6,409
As long as it seems possible Adams goes pro after next season, is it that unrealistic to think Waters can live with playing 20 mins a game on a team with an outstanding backcourt, and be a starter in his second season with high responsibility in running the offense?

Like to me, Ollie can talk about the history of guards at our school, Kemba did it as a freshman, Shabazz did it backing up Kemba and playing side by side a little, Boatright did it with Shabazz, and on and on down the list.

Waters is 5'9", so I don't think he's planning on going pro after his freshman year, so you play on a great stable of guards, practice against guys more seasoned and as talented as you, and then you do the same for another great guard when you're a junior/senior
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,395
Reaction Score
5,903
The threshold we were discussing was 30+ minutes per game, a bit more than finding minutes for you. It's basically getting starter minutes. Which depending on the situation, might not be possible for a freshman in a stacked position if the lineup has deficiencies elsewhere. Which is exactly UConn's situation. Which is why most recruits would balk at committing to a situation like that. Which is presumably one of the unsaid reasons MAL decommitted and is what might still keep Waters from coming.

No. There are just too many uncertainties to rationally think you can make that kind of calculation. Nova started four short guards at one point, because those were Wright's four best players. MAL/Waters doesn't think they can be one of our four best players? MAl/Waters doesn't think they can beat out Vitale for minutes? Why? If they are worried about Adams being in front of them for, most likely, one more year, then what? What good school are they going to where even if they say a way to the floor on year one they don't know a better guard will come in in year two?
 

ctchamps

We are UConn!! 4>1 But 5>>>>1 is even better!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
17,096
Reaction Score
42,379
I look at it more as 27 years of great Karma being balanced all at once. But if we're no longer in the karma surplus category, I'll take it.

This fanbase is unaccustomed to the fact that sometimes in life things just go wrong. KO's first five years in total have been mixed, and maybe overall somewhat disappointing, but I would assume he still has plenty of rope left. We now have an unexpected roster rebuilding job, but whether the roster rebuilding is expected or unexpected or necessary or unnecessary, some times it has to happen.

Let's fill the slots and go on from there.
New cycle. I'm confirming it!
 

HuskyHawk

The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
32,200
Reaction Score
83,033
It's a better question if you look at the 4s we've won championships with. They were Kevin Freeman, Josh Boone, Roscoe Smith and Deandre Daniels. Boone was a bruiser -- an old style 4. The other three viewed themselves as perimeter forwards and would have loved to have spent more time hanging out at the 3 point line if the coaches would have let them. As did, to varying degrees, Nadav and Donyell.

Freeman was not a perimeter player by any stretch of the imagination. He could step out and hit a mid-range jumper, but so could Karl Malone. Daniels was, but was also a great interior shotblocker. Smith was a great rebounder and though slight of build, didn't have much of a perimeter game or handle really. But you could argue Alex Oriakhi was the PF on that team anyway. Didn't Charlie play as much as Boone at PF? Better example of your point too.

I'll agree you can use versatile players and win at the college level. But I think you need a strong defending and rebounding center to get away with a 4 that floats to the perimeter. It also helps if you have big guards to make up for it. Larrier is going to take his 3's, you can count on that. We will have to see how this evolves.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
418
Reaction Score
1,907
Much depends on if we can land another Big, and what we see from Cobb and Diarra. I don't think we really want Larrier at the 4 more than 10 minutes a game. We might have to. Polley is a 4* just like Waters (yes, lower down in the rankings, whatever those are worth) and will absolutely play if he can defend. I think he's going to surprise people, and is probably underrated.

I don't mind Larrier as a Stretch 4. Quick, perimeter-focused lineup. Pressure the ball. It's Villanova's model.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2017
Messages
76
Reaction Score
26
Ok im going to tell you guys ONE MORE TIME TW will go NOWHERE he is not starting from DAY 1 !!! Post all the opinions on that you want you heard it hear FIRST! Time to move on
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
60
Guests online
1,378
Total visitors
1,438

Forum statistics

Threads
157,472
Messages
4,103,999
Members
9,994
Latest member
Newbie32


Top Bottom