CTBasketball
Former Owner of the Pizza Thread
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2012
- Messages
- 9,733
- Reaction Score
- 31,816
He played very well tonight, especially on defense. We'll need him down the stretch with foul trouble.
He played very well tonight, especially on defense. We'll need him down the stretch with foul trouble.
I just have to applaud your creativity in insulting our coach. So many people just go with the generic"KO Sucks", or "players don't improve", but you really show some out of the box thinking here.I agree. I think there may be a gold mine in enoch. He absolutely is a freshman, but his intensity and defense has improved. He doesn't look as lost. For example, if he would have played for Brad Stevens back in his Butler days, he would be very good by tournament time. Because that program could run offense plays other than the hide-in-the-back-alley-oop, and this they would run decent plays for the post player and Get Him The Ball. Go back and what some older video. Maybe someone should ask Mr. Stevens for some. Just saying.
Steve Enoch needs his team to trust him. His future is about how many touches in the post he gets. Last night he did pretty good, and then it was the lets dribble around the outside game. They seemed to forget he was an asset just a minute ago. Sometimes its 9 Uconn against 10 opposing players when the offense is this way. Awful to watch. Give the kid the ball. He will figure it out. Give him the ball. Remember how many dumb mistakes Jalen made? He got playing time. Now see what hes doing. Give Steve Enoch the ball.
Probably because for most of the year Enoch has been a liability in half court defensive sets, and playing Nolan or Facey maximized our changes of winning games. Or because Enoch is really most effective against slower, bigger post players like Cousins. Nolan and Facey have been more effective against quicker big men.I have been waiting all year for Ollie to use him more, his issues are those of inexperience, not ability. The kid is an absolute beast, but he is raw and just needs more minutes. Why waste the minutes with Nolan and Facey? They are not going to get better than what they are now. Same issue with Jalen Adams, the kid is your best guard, both offensively and defensively. They both need more run, the team is better now with them, and will be in the future.
You and I have been watching different games then. I dont think Nolan and Facey have been "effective" against anyone other than the cupcakes we have played. No offense, no rebounding, no blocks, no nothing. If you are telling me we stand a better chance of winning with them than Enoch, then we are truly screwed.Probably because for most of the year Enoch has been a liability in half court defensive sets, and playing Nolan or Facey maximized our changes of winning games. Or because Enoch is really most effective against slower, bigger post players like Cousins. Nolan and Facey have been more effective against quicker big men.
Yeah, I guess we're watching different games.You and I have been watching different games then. I dont think Nolan and Facey have been "effective" against anyone other than the cupcakes we have played. No offense, no rebounding, no blocks, no nothing. If you are telling me we stand a better chance of winning with them than Enoch, then we are truly screwed.
Another underappreciated part of having Enoch in there is that we absolutely CONTROLLED the glass while he was in the game.
He has 3 boards but Hamilton wrestled about 4 other from his grasp.
How? He boxes out the opposing big Relentlessly, rather than getting shoved under the basket like every other big we have, clearing space for himself and other huskies to get an uncontested rebound.
Why important? It wasn't a coincidence that once SE was in the game we started running..
When a team has no confidence in their Bigs rebounding they are forced to really dig down and help out, meaning you can't leak out and get in running lanes due to constant uncertainty/anxiety abound boarding.
In the future, Hamilton/Gibbs/Purvis can be more liberal getting into the break if SE is back there rather than Brimah/phil
Pay a lil bit more attention to pick and roll/ball screen coverage, Enoch was very deficient in that area compared to Nolan and even Facey, who isn't great in that area himself. A lot more to defense from a bigman than blocking shots.You and I have been watching different games then. I dont think Nolan and Facey have been "effective" against anyone other than the cupcakes we have played. No offense, no rebounding, no blocks, no nothing. If you are telling me we stand a better chance of winning with them than Enoch, then we are truly screwed.
I stand by my original post, Enoch gets better with every minute he plays. I think he is an upgrade to Facey and Nolan right now, with very limited run, and he will only get better. Does he have a ways to go? Sure, no one is saying he doesnt, particularly on defensive positioning and fouling. But he can impact a game, as witnessed last night. The only time I see Nolan or Facey change a game is typically for the worse, either by committing a turnover, or being weak inside with no rebounding, and one is a junior and the other is a senior. Given this thread, it appears a lot of people are making the same observation. Enoch = impact + upside, Nolan and Facey = zero to limited impact with no upside. I would rather see Enoch out there going through his growing pains as Nolan and Facey have hit their very low ceilings. He has natural God given ability, he is simply a better athlete than the other two, what he needs to improve on wont come from more practice. I think he gives the team a better chance to win now, and in the future. KO sounds like he is starting to come around to the same thinking. The "flaws" in his game people point out are outweighed by his impact on the game.Pay a lil bit more attention to pick and roll/ball screen coverage, Enoch was very deficient in that area compared to Nolan and even Facey, who isn't great in that area himself. A lot more to defense from a bigman than blocking shots.
You can stand by your original comments all you want, this team was playing elite D while he was playing very little. I like Enoch a lot and think he will be the starting C when Brimah departs, but that doesn't change my opinion that his understanding of how to hedge the high ball screen and sag back into coverage was a step behind the other bigs, and those defensive miscues add up and cost you games. There was a reason he wasn't playing (Jalen Adams was, so let's please stop this false narrative that KO wasn't giving him run), and despite the Boneyard's claims that they could coach this team better than KO, I'll defer to him on this one because it was obvious to anyone who understands defensive concepts that he Enoch had his shortcomings. Its a lot easier to give Enoch an extended run against USF than say SMU.I stand by my original post, Enoch gets better with every minute he plays. I think he is an upgrade to Facey and Nolan right now, with very limited run, and he will only get better. Does he have a ways to go? Sure, no one is saying he doesnt, particularly on defensive positioning and fouling. But he can impact a game, as witnessed last night. The only time I see Nolan or Facey change a game is typically for the worse, either by committing a turnover, or being weak inside with no rebounding, and one is a junior and the other is a senior. Given this thread, it appears a lot of people are making the same observation. Enoch = impact + upside, Nolan and Facey = zero to limited impact with no upside. I would rather see Enoch out there going through his growing pains as Nolan and Facey have hit their very low ceilings. He has natural God given ability, he is simply a better athlete than the other two, what he needs to improve on wont come from more practice. I think he gives the team a better chance to win now, and in the future. KO sounds like he is starting to come around to the same thinking. The "flaws" in his game people point out are outweighed by his impact on the game.
I obviously defer to you, oh Wizard of Westwood, Mr. 6000 posts, the rest of us mere mortals bow to your hoops OPINIONS.You can stand by your original comments all you want, this team was playing elite D while he was playing very little. I like Enoch a lot and think he will be the starting C when Brimah departs, but that doesn't change my opinion that his understanding of how to hedge the high ball screen and sag back into coverage was a step behind the other bigs, and those defensive miscues add up and cost you games. There was a reason he wasn't playing (Jalen Adams was, so let's please stop this false narrative that KO wasn't giving him run), and despite the Boneyard's claims that they could coach this team better than KO, I'll defer to him on this one because it was obvious to anyone who understands defensive concepts that he Enoch had his shortcomings. Its a lot easier to give Enoch an extended run against USF than say SMU.
He reminds me of a former UCONN warrior, Jeff Adrien!Enoch is going to be a solid player.
Reminds me a lot of Dejuan Blair from Pitt.
Nolan is a horrible screener, he doesn't move out from under the basket.Pay a lil bit more attention to pick and roll/ball screen coverage, Enoch was very deficient in that area compared to Nolan and even Facey, who isn't great in that area himself. A lot more to defense from a bigman than blocking shots.
Nolan is a horrible screener, he doesn't move out from under the basket.