The most ridiculous stat ever of this tournament
- Thread starter HailUConn
- Start date
FfldCntyFan
Texas: Property of UConn Men's Basketball program
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2011
- Messages
- 12,331
- Reaction Score
- 42,308
Shot tracker (second half only).
FfldCntyFan
Texas: Property of UConn Men's Basketball program
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2011
- Messages
- 12,331
- Reaction Score
- 42,308
Game flow. I love the long, horizontal orange line.
CL82
NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 57,062
- Reaction Score
- 209,392
What's really interesting is if you compare this to last year's shop distribution which was all layups and three-pointers, very few mid range. Last year's team was pretty much the archetype of modern basketball.
That said I'm not sure that our current two point attack is by design. Hurley said he's going to figure out what's going on from three for us and fix it. If that happens we become a much more dangerous team. That should be a pretty scary prospect for the other teams still playing.
We seem to be on an alternating schedule of shooting well or shooting poorly, mainly since the start of the BE tournament, but here's the stats through the first four games of the NCAA. Our percentages are in the left column and the opponents % in the right column:
UConn: ------------------------------------Opponent:
Game 1 BE (Xavier) 7/21 (33.3%)----Xavier was 5/21 (23.8%)
Game 2 BE (St. Johns) 10/22 (45.4%)----St. J's was 11/22 (50%)
Game 3 BE (Marquette) 7/24 (29.2%)----Marq was 6/18 (33.3%)
NCAA round 1 Stetson 9/24 (37.5%)----Stetson was 3/20 (15%)
-Round 2 Northwestern 3/22 (13.6%)----NW was 4/15 (26.7%)
-Round 3 San Diego St 10/26 (38.5%)----SD St was 5/22 22.7%)
-Round 4 Illinois -------3/17 (17.6%)----llinois was 6/23 (26.1%)
Lot's of variables of course with different opponents and when we're up the other team has been down and vice versa. Sure would be nice if DH and the staff can figure it out in case we need a barrage of three's to keep the streak going. No need to mention why........
UConn: ------------------------------------Opponent:
Game 1 BE (Xavier) 7/21 (33.3%)----Xavier was 5/21 (23.8%)
Game 2 BE (St. Johns) 10/22 (45.4%)----St. J's was 11/22 (50%)
Game 3 BE (Marquette) 7/24 (29.2%)----Marq was 6/18 (33.3%)
NCAA round 1 Stetson 9/24 (37.5%)----Stetson was 3/20 (15%)
-Round 2 Northwestern 3/22 (13.6%)----NW was 4/15 (26.7%)
-Round 3 San Diego St 10/26 (38.5%)----SD St was 5/22 22.7%)
-Round 4 Illinois -------3/17 (17.6%)----llinois was 6/23 (26.1%)
Lot's of variables of course with different opponents and when we're up the other team has been down and vice versa. Sure would be nice if DH and the staff can figure it out in case we need a barrage of three's to keep the streak going. No need to mention why........
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2023
- Messages
- 272
- Reaction Score
- 1,583
Sheesh, we’ve really stagnated since that Stetson game haven’t we?
August_West
Universal remote, put it down on docking station.
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 51,348
- Reaction Score
- 89,289
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2011
- Messages
- 48,799
- Reaction Score
- 167,537
UConn's 23.1 point margin of victory over two seasons is the largest ever in tournament history over a 2 year span, even larger than UCLA's largest margin of victory over a 2 year span with Lew Alcindor.
Hopefully we can do it for 2 more games.
Hopefully we can do it for 2 more games.
Chin Diesel
Power of Love
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 32,640
- Reaction Score
- 98,954
Three crazy stats in one screen shot:
1. 31-1 outside BE over past two season
2. 10 straight tourney wins by 13 or more (NCAA record)
3. Leading by 30 or more points in all four games this tourney (Wouldn't surprise me if that's a record).
AK did say on Jared's podcast the ball has too much air in it....which is crazy...He did say that shouldnt be an excuse. Doesn't the NCAA check this stuff? They could give Tom Brady a call for helpWe seem to be on an alternating schedule of shooting well or shooting poorly, mainly since the start of the BE tournament, but here's the stats through the first four games of the NCAA. Our percentages are in the left column and the opponents % in the right column:
UConn: ------------------------------------Opponent:
Game 1 BE (Xavier) 7/21 (33.3%)----Xavier was 5/21 (23.8%)
Game 2 BE (St. Johns) 10/22 (45.4%)----St. J's was 11/22 (50%)
Game 3 BE (Marquette) 7/24 (29.2%)----Marq was 6/18 (33.3%)
NCAA round 1 Stetson 9/24 (37.5%)----Stetson was 3/20 (15%)
-Round 2 Northwestern 3/22 (13.6%)----NW was 4/15 (26.7%)
-Round 3 San Diego St 10/26 (38.5%)----SD St was 5/22 22.7%)
-Round 4 Illinois -------3/17 (17.6%)----llinois was 6/23 (26.1%)
Lot's of variables of course with different opponents and when we're up the other team has been down and vice versa. Sure would be nice if DH and the staff can figure it out in case we need a barrage of three's to keep the streak going. No need to mention why........
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2018
- Messages
- 3,039
- Reaction Score
- 9,700
A crazy stat I saw was that against San Diego State the Huskies made 82% of two point shots.
FfldCntyFan
Texas: Property of UConn Men's Basketball program
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2011
- Messages
- 12,331
- Reaction Score
- 42,308
I think that leading each game by 30+ points at some point is the winner.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 13,238
- Reaction Score
- 34,897
They didn't even realize the two different 3pt lines in the women's game...
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 698
- Reaction Score
- 1,766
With the 2 times the ball got stuck at the rim and almost a third, it looked to me like the ball was underinflated, but it may just be the Wilson ball they are using in the tourney. I don’t think many other teams use it in the regular season.
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2019
- Messages
- 890
- Reaction Score
- 9,887
BGesus4
Running everywhere
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2016
- Messages
- 2,826
- Reaction Score
- 17,093
Just checked this for last year:
Iona - 24
St Mary’s - 18
Ark - 29
Gonz - 33
Mia - 20
SDSU - 17
Just insanity. Do fans ever get anything like this in any sport? WE ARE NOT WORTHY!!!
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2022
- Messages
- 172
- Reaction Score
- 1,062
If we win the next two by a total of 18 points PLUS we have the most dominant NCAA tournament ever. Passing KY 1996 at 128 points scoring difference
But parity??
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2015
- Messages
- 1,507
- Reaction Score
- 9,135
Doomed
Especially amazing that in the Illinois game we lead by 30 with only three made 3's. Who could ever imagine that stat in today's game?
Check post #18. BGesus4 says the differential last year was 141. I'm too lazy right now to check and may not be reading something right.
That's not the differential, those were our largest leadsCheck post #18. BGesus4 says the differential last year was 141. I'm too lazy right now to check and may not be reading something right.
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2024
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction Score
- 4
Well the UConn scores that you post are the pity scores where subs are inserted around 4 minutes and slow the pace to be nice. The real differential with the starters playing to about a minute and a half are higher but unknown. Probably +5 more or so. The pity differential. You have to factor that into you line bets.