nelsonmuntz
Point Center
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 44,170
- Reaction Score
- 33,026
Bust that TV contract with ESPN, or at least the exclusivity clause. This is life or death for the league.
If the BBall schools don't let FB schools go to 12/20 format, we need a split right away. I just don't see how the BE has any chance of surviving without going to 12 FB schools. I know some people keep preaching value etc like Marinatto, but where did it get us today?
I have said many times in the old board that we should have added UCF and ECU a long time ago. Today, they both would be BCS caliber schools and we would be sitting at 9 or 10 even with Pitt and CUSE both leaving. Instead, we are scrambling again to add bunch of football onlies. Why? why? why? Football onlies are what BBALL schools want. They will get us nowhere again in a few years. We will be raided again at some point.
If we can't get into the ACC or whatever stable conference now, we better take the lead and make our current home as comfortable as possible. Oh yeah, please fire the biggest moron in the world Marinatto.
I've always wondered why the Big East hasn't taken in ECU - a Big East school in the Carolina school's back yard - good football school with a solid fanbase.
I've always wondered why the Big East hasn't taken in ECU - a Big East school in the Carolina school's back yard - good football school with a solid fanbase.
bottom line is that the Big East is first, last and always a basketball league and nothing ever changed that. there was no understanding among the non-football schools that their succeess was related to the success of the football league. Some still don't get that...At the end of the day though, i suspect that they will discover that the payout for BASKETBALL will also be less than it would have been with a solid football league. If UCONN ends up leaving, and I think they will at some point, you have to ask what the Big East basketball conference value will be without the Huskies, Pitt and Syracuse.
I can guarantee that the Big East football schools will make less money without the basketball schools than they will make with them. How do I know? Because they are still together.
Can someone please explain to me how dropping 7 big market, basketball schools with lots of history makes the football conference better?
I would recommend only dropping the basketball schools if they don't allow FB schools to go to 12.
It doesn't make it better. It makes it workable. Nelson, we've kept with the basketball schools and it hasn't been successful. If you don't have a football program, its a great arrangement. But if you do, it just doesn't work. How many of the original football schools remain? If a hybrid conference is such a great idea, how come nobody else has even looked at it? It means you can make decisions which are designed to improve the conference. Can't do that in the Big East, at least not without a whole lot of haggling. And it means you can, if you choose, move quickly.I can guarantee that the Big East football schools will make less money without the basketball schools than they will make with them. How do I know? Because they are still together.
Can someone please explain to me how dropping 7 big market, basketball schools with lots of history makes the football conference better?
I can guarantee that the Big East football schools will make less money without the basketball schools than they will make with them. How do I know? Because they are still together.
Can someone please explain to me how dropping 7 big market, basketball schools with lots of history makes the football conference better?
Any argument to continue on associate with basketball-only is argument to drop football.
+1. I don't care how much TV markets basketball schools bring onboard. If they don't let FB schools expand to protect ourselves, there will be no more FB schools in the conference. We all need to make a decision it is either expansion or die. It is that simple. Basketball will NEVER drive the bus in a BCS conference and it is time for these Bball onlies to accept that.
Any argument to continue on associate with basketball-only is argument to drop football.
Last word from TCU was they are not coming to the BE. There are probably better options for TCU once some of the dust clears.Seriously, got to readress reality here:
Can you please explain to me why Syracuse, Pittsburgh, Boston College, Miami, Virginia Tech are in the ACC and not Georgetown, Villanova, St. John's, Seton Hall and Providence?
Please?
I already said, that if the leadership were in line with the business of BCS level conferences in the united states, ejecting the catholics would be dumb. They do have value, but their leadership is destroying the league slowly over time. The big east football schools the 7 of them as long as TCU is still on board, are better off long term without the catholics and their leadership. They might lose some cash flow in the first year or two, but the benefits of being in a conference that has the priorities in line would soon outweigh.
The key - to all of it - is retaining the BCS bid. I hope our leadership is actively pursuing what it takes to retain that, should the conference fracture along the natural fault line.
Of the orignial founding members, the programs with 1A football are gone. 12 programs have played games under the big east label. Five of them now reside in the ACC. Syracuse, Pittsburgh, Boston College, Virginia Tech and Miami. Temple played as a football only member and has the wonderful distinction of being the only football program ever kicked out of the big east. Talk about black sheep. The big east has raided other conferences more than once - for basketball.
Rutgers, West Virginia and UConn are the programs with longest tenure in the league, and all of them are looking elsewhere.
With a guarnateed BCS bid, and the other four newbies in tow, something useful can be done, and the catholics are aon their own.