So, 15 straight FFs? | Page 2 | The Boneyard

So, 15 straight FFs?

Aluminny69

Old Timer
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,479
Reaction Score
22,558
I worry. Nothing is a given. Every team wants to be the underdog hero. Every single game matters and there are no freebies.
1678210622661.png
 
Joined
May 30, 2019
Messages
1,337
Reaction Score
3,464
most of the things between #2 and #12 are in the hands of the commitee, but you have to win the 4 first games to be in the dance, simply said
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2022
Messages
5,555
Reaction Score
32,907
Parity is strong and any of these teams on a given night can be lights out.

SC? Given
Iowa - Certainly can
Indiana - Certainly can
UConn - Certainly can
Stanford - to be determined. Not sure about them.
VT - Maybe?
My question for Iowa is can they beat VT. If not, there’s no way they beat SC. Also, one thing I’d say is UConn looked like world beaters the past 3 days without shooting “lights out.” The threat posed by Azzi and Lou certainly forced teams to open up the paint and Dorka and Aaliyah took advantage. Lights out for us would be if Azzi Lou and Caroline hit their 3s. We have a whole nother level, another gear. We dominated so far because our D is suffocating. We gave up a ton of O boards in the 1st quarter and only two pts off them.
I question whether Iowa is a "Certainly can."

With their offense, the can beat ANY team on a given day. However, a championship run requires more than that. … I don't think their defense is strong enough to win on the days their offense isn't clicking.

Simply not balanced enough.
I totally agree. It’s not impossible for Iowa to win, but the odds are stacked against them. The obstacle SC poses is that they’re bigger and faster at almost every position. Can Iowa win relying only on perimeter shooting? Because SC is absolutely capable of shutting down paint scoring. Maybe they can win from outside, but SC has the personnel to face guard Clark for 40 mins. Someone else would have to hit all those 3s for them. Against us, Nika suffocated Clark most of the game and Martin had a career game from 3, and it still wasn’t enough. UConn and Stanford are the only teams both big enough and fast enough to challenge SC’s defense, and both have proved it already this year.

In fact, I suspect UConn is taller than both SC and Stanford and certainly no slower. We’re shorter than Cardoso and Betts, and the same or taller everywhere else.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Messages
1,058
Reaction Score
1,989
I can see the Committee putting SC in the same side of the bracket in greenville for ticket sales . Either way with the regional 2 spots there not a big difference if were in their bracket or not . 2 east coast schools highest ticket sellers in the nation either way .
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2014
Messages
1,110
Reaction Score
4,218
I mean, I wouldn't be surprised if any of the top teams got knocked off early, or won it. I think the NATY goes to one of these teams: Parity is strong and any of these teams on a given night can be lights out.

SC? Given
Iowa - Certainly can
Indiana - Certainly can
UConn - Certainly can
Stanford - to be determined. Not sure about them.
VT - Maybe?
Totally agree that almost anyone can get knocked off. But I’d add to the possibles: LSU, Maryland, Utah, Texas (Vic). I think any of those teams could make the Final Four, and once that happens, anything can happen.
 
Joined
Apr 3, 2018
Messages
215
Reaction Score
831
It's all up to the UCONN players cause it's obvious the Polls, and the 'Bracketology Experts' don't want UCONN to get there!
 
Joined
Apr 3, 2018
Messages
215
Reaction Score
831
I question whether Iowa is a "Certainly can."

With their offense, the can beat ANY team on a given day. However, a championship run requires more than that. You have to be able to beat any opponent on every day for 6 games. I don't think their defense is strong enough to win on the days their offense isn't clicking.

Simply not balanced enough.
If UCONN remains healthy, and plays like they did in the Big East Tournament, it's really just UCONN and SC! The others are good, but not good enough!
Seeding won't change that!
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2014
Messages
1,110
Reaction Score
4,218
It's all up to the UCONN players cause it's obvious the Polls, and the 'Bracketology Experts' don't want UCONN to get there!
Actually the Committee could have something to say about whether they get there.
 
Joined
Nov 14, 2018
Messages
310
Reaction Score
862
Honestly, who knows? Are they capable? Sure! But we really don't know what will happen. I expect some big surprises / upsets this year. BIG time. I actually expect one of the teams in the final four NOBODY has talked about (well, at least the elite 8.)

We can debate this until we're blue in the face and it won't mean much. I just know UConn is certainly capable to win it all.

Nothing left for us to do but sit back and watch.
The whole fun of it is not knowing.
 
Joined
Mar 29, 2016
Messages
503
Reaction Score
1,854
as Geno says, take it one game at a time. Do not get ahead of yourself. Wait till the bracket comes out, then we can predict we will win game number one. Win that, we get to worry about game two. Win that ...
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2022
Messages
739
Reaction Score
2,938
UConn needs to up the defensive intensity on the perimeter, get some turnovers, and push the pace on offense for easy looks and points. They get in trouble when they play a stagnant offensive half court perimeter game when the opposition presses the guards. Having the Top 7 will help open things up. Geno can substitute more, play more aggressive, etc. Can they keep this pace up for 40 minutes in the E8 to FF rounds?? No one knows right now, including Geno.
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2023
Messages
379
Reaction Score
810
Totally agree that almost anyone can get knocked off. But I’d add to the possibles: LSU, Maryland, Utah, Texas (Vic). I think any of those teams could make the Final Four, and once that happens, anything can happen.

A 3 seed has won the tournament 2-40 times, no 4 seed or lower has ever won it. 1 seeds have won it 31-40 times. 2 seeds are 7-40.
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2023
Messages
379
Reaction Score
810
My question for Iowa is can they beat VT. If not, there’s no way they beat SC. Also, one thing I’d say is UConn looked like world beaters the past 3 days without shooting “lights out.” The threat posed by Azzi and Lou certainly forced teams to open up the paint and Dorka and Aaliyah took advantage. Lights out for us would be if Azzi Lou and Caroline hit their 3s. We have a whole nother level, another gear. We dominated so far because our D is suffocating. We gave up a ton of O boards in the 1st quarter and only two pts off them.

I totally agree. It’s not impossible for Iowa to win, but the odds are stacked against them. The obstacle SC poses is that they’re bigger and faster at almost every position. Can Iowa win relying only on perimeter shooting? Because SC is absolutely capable of shutting down paint scoring. Maybe they can win from outside, but SC has the personnel to face guard Clark for 40 mins. Someone else would have to hit all those 3s for them. Against us, Nika suffocated Clark most of the game and Martin had a career game from 3, and it still wasn’t enough. UConn and Stanford are the only teams both big enough and fast enough to challenge SC’s defense, and both have proved it already this year.

In fact, I suspect UConn is taller than both SC and Stanford and certainly no slower. We’re shorter than Cardoso and Betts, and the same or taller everywhere else.
Cardoso 6’7
Boston 6’5
Amihere 6’4
Feagin 6’4
Watkins 6’3
Saxton 6’2
Beal 6’1
Hall 6’0
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
2,992
Reaction Score
8,456
As others have said, it depends on UConn's seed and bracket. Going into the Elite 8 game, If it is unfortunate enough to get paired with, say, SC, that could be a real problem.
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2022
Messages
5,555
Reaction Score
32,907
Don’t read the bench heights to me. Compare who actually plays.
Boston Saxton Beal Cook Fletcher — that’s who starts. When Cardoso comes in sometimes she plays next to Boston but often she subs for her.
Dorka Aaliyah Caroline Lou Nika. 6’5”, 6’3”, 6’2, 6’2, 5’11” (this is what Nika claims these days) vs 6’5”, 6’2, 6’1”, 5’9”, 5’9”

SC can put a taller lineup out there — I never denied it. But that’s a different question.

How about Stanford? They start Brink Iriafen Lepolo Jones Jump: 6’4”, 6’3, 5’7”, 6’1”, 6’0”. Can they bring taller players off the bench? Of course.
 

Online statistics

Members online
150
Guests online
2,426
Total visitors
2,576

Forum statistics

Threads
157,163
Messages
4,085,870
Members
9,982
Latest member
CJasmer


Top Bottom