- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 13,245
- Reaction Score
- 34,960
I didn't realize you were so unbiased. Sorry for challenging such a disinterested person.You do realize that every game isn't won by the better team right?
Listen go on in your belief that Rutgers is better than South Carolina and the world is biased. Just try to realize that your opinion is biased and the unbiased disagree with you.
In a 12 game season, if the result on the field doesn't matter, what does? There seems no way to tell who the best team is.
Also, that's a pretty weak response on your part. So Boise won a game on a Statue of Liberty play. The prognosis was that Oklahoma was going to kill them. Even if it is true that Oklahoma was better, people were wrong that Boise wasn't on the same playing field. Look at the others:
- Utah whipped Alabama 31-17. Seems Utah was better.
- Florida whipped Ohio State 41-14. If you didn't think Florida was better, not sure what to tell you. That was the year people thought the B10 deserved two teams in the title game.
- Texas proved itself at least as good as USC (better, in my books, for winning). These experts you were touting thought they were way better.