- Joined
- Dec 29, 2011
- Messages
- 2,371
- Reaction Score
- 29,112
Obviously people could pick up a late recruit, someone could leave or someone could reclassify but if everything stayed the same how do you rank the teams in conference for next year. I think this is a much improved league next year. Is it a dominant league? Of course not. But it was an extremely young league last year that did nothing out of league. That must improve this year, but I think it will. My rankings:
1. UConn (has the most talent in the league and maybe the deepest team. Key is how quickly team chemistry develops).
2. Cincy (returns every key player, gets their coach back and brings in a couple of freshman. I think a very underrated team. As always, can they score enough).
3. SMU (I still like them a lot and they could easily win the league, but I think some people are forgetting about how much they lose in terms of role players. Not as dominant inside. If Frazier returns, they could be the team to beat).
4. Memphis (if they solve their PG problems, I love their frontcourt, and remember how many new faces they had last year. Coach is always a concern).
5. Tulsa (brings everyone back and will be one of if not the oldest teams in the league. Still don't have enough shooters to be a consistent threat).
6. Temple (loses their starting backcourt which hurts them. They play a competitive schedule, and if they can get good guard play, I think they have a good shot at the tourney).
7. Houston (brought in some good players, and I like Sampson as a coach).
8. USF (Slowly improving).
9. UCF (Good recruiting class and some good young players. Big year for the coach).
10. East Carolina (Small step forward).
11. Tulane (Take a step back).
1. UConn (has the most talent in the league and maybe the deepest team. Key is how quickly team chemistry develops).
2. Cincy (returns every key player, gets their coach back and brings in a couple of freshman. I think a very underrated team. As always, can they score enough).
3. SMU (I still like them a lot and they could easily win the league, but I think some people are forgetting about how much they lose in terms of role players. Not as dominant inside. If Frazier returns, they could be the team to beat).
4. Memphis (if they solve their PG problems, I love their frontcourt, and remember how many new faces they had last year. Coach is always a concern).
5. Tulsa (brings everyone back and will be one of if not the oldest teams in the league. Still don't have enough shooters to be a consistent threat).
6. Temple (loses their starting backcourt which hurts them. They play a competitive schedule, and if they can get good guard play, I think they have a good shot at the tourney).
7. Houston (brought in some good players, and I like Sampson as a coach).
8. USF (Slowly improving).
9. UCF (Good recruiting class and some good young players. Big year for the coach).
10. East Carolina (Small step forward).
11. Tulane (Take a step back).