Path Forward for UConn | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Path Forward for UConn

Joined
Jun 17, 2013
Messages
1,557
Reaction Score
4,185
The ACC doesn’t have to pay us $35 large to get us. If they offered us $20M a year through the GOR expiration (plus a pro rata share of revenue increases), we would take it in a heartbeat.
Jez, have we lost all dignity? We may have to end up there, but let's not drop our drawers just yet! I think the ACC is at serious risk and may look our way without us playing the role of a street walker.

Importantly, I don't see the SEC standing pat while the Big goes to 18 next year. That means they will campaign hard for Clemson and FSU. The money will be a monster. Look at what the SEC will be. Far and away, it will be the superior FB conference, making money hand over fist. (IMO, the ACC GOR will be dealt with a few wheelbarrows of dinero.) The will have added Texas, OU, FSU and Clemson to get to 18 vs. the Big adding USC, UCLA, OR and the fake Huskies. Not for nothing, the SEC will still be a 2 time zone conference, while the Big will have to deal with 4 time zones. That, in and of itself, is cumbersome.

Thus, I think the ACC must do some shoring up. I don't see any way they avoid us. They certainly shouldn't listen to BC. Objectively, BC has been an ACC failure. Until the ACC adds hockey, it will remain that way.
 

Fishy

Elite Premium Poster
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
18,124
Reaction Score
131,892
I think you undersell exactly the headache that is #2. The GOR + exit fee at this point is valued around $500 million. Even if you could raise the funds, the ACC would still have to agree to let them out of the GOR. Because it’s not strictly speaking something you can pay your way out of. It will have to be litigated on.

But also we don’t know if the SEC would double-dip on markets when the flagship school is already in the fold. Would A&M have been invited after the Longhorns? UNC would likely be their first port of call if the GOR workaround came to fruition.

Forget anyone challenging the GOR....

Florida State is acting like they have options. They don't.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2016
Messages
4,072
Reaction Score
7,943
I think you undersell exactly the headache that is #2. The GOR + exit fee at this point is valued around $500 million. Even if you could raise the funds, the ACC would still have to agree to let them out of the GOR. Because it’s not strictly speaking something you can pay your way out of. It will have to be litigated on.
You have to ask if the ACC would be all that interested in having two royally pissed off schools in their conference that would cost them and awful lot to defend against. The answer is no, which is why the exit price is always lower.
 

FfldCntyFan

Texas: Property of UConn Men's Basketball program
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
12,361
Reaction Score
42,417
Forget anyone challenging the GOR....

Florida State is acting like they have options. They don't.
They have an option, they just don't have any good options.

In Goodfellas there was an early storyline about a guy who owned a restaurant and needed Paulie (Paul Sorvino's character) to help with protection. Over time, as Paulie pulled more and more cash from the restaurant's profits, the solution came to burning it down and taking the insurance money.

If FSU follows through and aligns with a PE firm to fund their way out of the GOR, they may as well hand over the campus and everything else the school owns to the PE firm now as that is how it will end up and it will be less painful it it happens quickly instead of over a decade or so.
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
765
Reaction Score
1,184
You have to ask if the ACC would be all that interested in having two royally pissed off schools in their conference that would cost them and awful lot to defend against. The answer is no, which is why the exit price is always lower.
FSU has been royally pissed off since I was a kid in the 90s. That is their default position.

Exit fees have been negotiated down before. Most famously for the ACC, Maryland wanted to pay $17 million under an old provision, the ACC wanted $52 million new exit feel passed almost assuredly as punishment right before Maryland walked. The ACC simply withheld money until an agreement was settled ($31 million, by far the largest exit fee up to that point).

But a GOR is not an exit fee. It has a monetary value, but it represents something more than money. It was created by media and conferences to ensure their investment. No media company or conference wants to see the GOR breaking point because it opens up Pandora’s box. Which is not to say we won’t see it at some point, but before FSU is on the hook for $40 million/year to Wall Street or the Saudi princes or whomever, they better be dang sure they have a spot ready for them because they won’t be making friends in the process.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2016
Messages
4,072
Reaction Score
7,943
FSU has been royally pissed off since I was a kid in the 90s. That is their default position.

Exit fees have been negotiated down before. Most famously for the ACC, Maryland wanted to pay $17 million under an old provision, the ACC wanted $52 million new exit feel passed almost assuredly as punishment right before Maryland walked. The ACC simply withheld money until an agreement was settled ($31 million, by far the largest exit fee up to that point).

But a GOR is not an exit fee. It has a monetary value, but it represents something more than money. It was created by media and conferences to ensure their investment. No media company or conference wants to see the GOR breaking point because it opens up Pandora’s box. Which is not to say we won’t see it at some point, but before FSU is on the hook for $40 million/year to Wall Street or the Saudi princes or whomever, they better be dang sure they have a spot ready for them because they won’t be making friends in the process.
Yup, they have to buy back their media rights. I just lumped that under the umbrella of the exit
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
765
Reaction Score
1,184
Yup, they have to buy back their media rights. I just lumped that under the umbrella of the exit
But it will be higher than an exit fee discount because there is more at stake. I’d be shocked if they aren’t asked to pay over 80% over it in a settlement that only comes about after a protracted legal battle. And I’m still not sure FSU would actually go through that scorched earth plan because at the end of the day they have to look good enough at the end of this for conferences and media partners wanting to get in bed with them by ironically asking them to sign a GOR.
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2012
Messages
5,666
Reaction Score
25,130
But it will be higher than an exit fee discount because there is more at stake. I’d be shocked if they aren’t asked to pay over 80% over it in a settlement that only comes about after a protracted legal battle. And I’m still not sure FSU would actually go through that scorched earth plan because at the end of the day they have to look good enough at the end of this for conferences and media partners wanting to get in bed with them by ironically asking them to sign a GOR.
I have no idea if its even possible, but could private equity/fsu have deep enough pockets to make it too expensive for the acc to actually fight in court? sort of what liv did to the pga?
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2016
Messages
4,072
Reaction Score
7,943
But it will be higher than an exit fee discount because there is more at stake. I’d be shocked if they aren’t asked to pay over 80% over it in a settlement that only comes about after a protracted legal battle.
Look, those two schools can join with other members and make life very difficult. To the point that the ACC would have little leverage. The good thing is that there are a maximum of 6 billets left in the P2.
 

FfldCntyFan

Texas: Property of UConn Men's Basketball program
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
12,361
Reaction Score
42,417
I have no idea if its even possible, but could private equity/fsu have deep enough pockets to make it too expensive for the acc to actually fight in court? sort of what liv did to the pga?
I'm massively confident that PE firms have more than deep enough pockets to do just this.

I'm even more confident that PE firms won't invest a penny unless they fully believe the return will be well beyond what a conventional, low risk investment can offer. They won't throw cash away.
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
765
Reaction Score
1,184
Look, those two schools can join with other members and make life very difficult. To the point that the ACC would have little leverage. The good thing is that there are a maximum of 6 billets left in the P2.

The ACC already has the leverage, the GOR. One of the Magnificent 7 already told FSU to behave. They could be good copping/bad copping the situation, time will tell. But I haven’t seen anything yet to suggest the GOR/ACC is vulnerable in the next decade.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,358
Reaction Score
46,667
One of two things will happen when the Big 12 has to renegotiate. Either there is a healty tv market and they get a deal that destroys the ACC. Or there is a luke warm market and the top teams go to the SEC and Big 10 and the remaining schools fall by the waste side. Under no circumstance will the remaining schools join the ACC in a sweetened deal. How do I know this? Because if the Big 12 is unsuccessful in landing a better deal than the ACC, consolidation will be in full effect. And by consolidation, I mean the P2 and everyone else.
For me, it's the exact opposite of this.

None of the B12 will draw the attention of the SEC and B1G.

The ACC will be earning more money than the B12 in next few years.

The B12 have loaded themselves with the bottom half of the Pac12 (which the networks obviously didn't want) and w/ questionable schools like Cincy, Houston and UCF. Never mind the fact that they commandeered the sparsely populated Plains states already.

By 2031, the ACC schools may be ready to add members as they can envision losing FSU, Clemson, UNC and Virginia just a few years later (4?). They'll be able to offer longer term stability to schools like Kansas, TCU and Texas Tech, and more money as well, since the presumed remains of the ACC will still be in heavily populated areas of the southeast.

This gives the advantage to the ACC. The B12 will get plucked.
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2012
Messages
5,666
Reaction Score
25,130
For me, it's the exact opposite of this.

None of the B12 will draw the attention of the SEC and B1G.

The ACC will be earning more money than the B12 in next few years.

The B12 have loaded themselves with the bottom half of the Pac12 (which the networks obviously didn't want) and w/ questionable schools like Cincy, Houston and UCF. Never mind the fact that they commandeered the sparsely populated Plains states already.

By 2031, the ACC schools may be ready to add members as they can envision losing FSU, Clemson, UNC and Virginia just a few years later (4?). They'll be able to offer longer term stability to schools like Kansas, TCU and Texas Tech, and more money as well, since the presumed remains of the ACC will still be in heavily populated areas of the southeast.

This gives the advantage to the ACC. The B12 will get plucked.
Who will want to join and who will pay up for a sinking ship? If the ACC loses those top schools, the Big 12 is far more competetive and appealing. I don't think either survive but to me, the Big 12 has a better chance than a diluted ACC. The Big 12 added state schools. No one will care for Wake Forest, BC, Syracuse and Duke football.
 
Joined
Nov 19, 2014
Messages
1,212
Reaction Score
1,565
I guess if you assume the absolute best for the ACC and absolute worst for the Big 12 but none of this is close to reality. Under almost all circumstances, Clemson, FSU, UNC, UVA, Va Tech, Miami, and NC State are gone.
+1, yea. That is an interesting take. It will be what is left of the ACC that will be evaluated. I think this consolidation in the B12, B10 and SEC does not bode well for the renewal of the Big East tv deal. Fox/Espn have tons of content now, and the original Fox deal was widely thought of as overpriced to get into the market. A shared bball streaming deal is not likely to benefit the schools in the Big East with the larger fan bases if it is shared. Not a good development with anyone with football. Best case scenario the current ACC adds some teams and Uconn gets a bid, but for how long that holds together if the big guys are looking who knows. Also, wonder if the expansion would be approved by the same group looking to maximize. However, it would likely be better than the Big East alternative. Bottom line is a football deal is a must, unless the program goes by the wayside. However, I will be surprised if the next tv deal is as much as the current one the way things are trending. The new B12 commish was savy. He has a group of similar type schools that are both competitive and likely to stay together. He seized on the same weakness that the broke up the Big east back in 2012/13 turning down a tv deal. Not a good move.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2016
Messages
4,072
Reaction Score
7,943
For me, it's the exact opposite of this.

None of the B12 will draw the attention of the SEC and B1G.

The ACC will be earning more money than the B12 in next few years.

The B12 have loaded themselves with the bottom half of the Pac12 (which the networks obviously didn't want) and w/ questionable schools like Cincy, Houston and UCF. Never mind the fact that they commandeered the sparsely populated Plains states already.

By 2031, the ACC schools may be ready to add members as they can envision losing FSU, Clemson, UNC and Virginia just a few years later (4?). They'll be able to offer longer term stability to schools like Kansas, TCU and Texas Tech, and more money as well, since the presumed remains of the ACC will still be in heavily populated areas of the southeast.

This gives the advantage to the ACC. The B12 will get plucked.
Where will VA and NC go if the B1G is at 20? The SEC? I doubt that.
 

FfldCntyFan

Texas: Property of UConn Men's Basketball program
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
12,361
Reaction Score
42,417
Where will VA and NC go if the B1G is at 20? The SEC? I doubt that.
UNC & UVA will be approached by both the B1G & SEC. The remainder of the ACC (ND excluded) will be schools that hope one of the big two would want them (Clemson, FSU, maybe Ga Tech, Miami, Duke, NC St & Va Tech) and schools who know neither of the big two would want them (the rest of the ACC).
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2016
Messages
4,072
Reaction Score
7,943
UNC & UVA will be approached by both the B1G & SEC. The remainder of the ACC (ND excluded) will be schools that hope one of the big two would want them (Clemson, FSU, maybe Ga Tech, Miami, Duke, NC St & Va Tech) and schools who know neither of the big two would want them (the rest of the ACC).
Hard for me to see that if the B1G is at 20.
 

FfldCntyFan

Texas: Property of UConn Men's Basketball program
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
12,361
Reaction Score
42,417
Hard for me to see that if the B1G is at 20.
I believe their eventual landing point is 24, with four six school divisions (which is also why I belie Cal & Stanford will end up in the B1G).

Those two and ND will be half of the final six additions. UVA & UNC will be targets and a number of candidates will be competing for the final spot.
 
Joined
Sep 16, 2011
Messages
48,847
Reaction Score
167,788
I believe their eventual landing point is 24, with four six school divisions (which is also why I belie Cal & Stanford will end up in the B1G).

Those two and ND will be half of the final six additions. UVA & UNC will be targets and a number of candidates will be competing for the final spot.
I don't see any way Notre Dame ever joins the Big 10.
 

FfldCntyFan

Texas: Property of UConn Men's Basketball program
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
12,361
Reaction Score
42,417
I don't see any way Notre Dame ever joins the Big 10.
I believe a) that's the only conference they would ever consider joining for all sports (including football) and b) eventually (likely a little more than a decade from now) they'll have to park their football program in a conference.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,358
Reaction Score
46,667
Where will VA and NC go if the B1G is at 20? The SEC? I doubt that.
?? Who goes to the B1G?

UNC is ticketed for the SEC. The fans and admin want it, and it would be a big boon for the SEC to get into a populated state w/ good high school football, not to mention the basketball.

As for Virginia, they will go B1G. The B1G has been trying to get into VA for years, and the Penn State and Maryland adds already have a lot to do with VA.

My wild card in all this is Florida St. I don't know if they are SEC or B1G. It's a mystery.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,358
Reaction Score
46,667
I believe a) that's the only conference they would ever consider joining for all sports (including football) and b) eventually (likely a little more than a decade from now) they'll have to park their football program in a conference.
It's the alumni that don't want it to join; obviously the president, AD and administrators do want it to join a conference.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,358
Reaction Score
46,667
I believe their eventual landing point is 24, with four six school divisions (which is also why I belie Cal & Stanford will end up in the B1G).

Those two and ND will be half of the final six additions. UVA & UNC will be targets and a number of candidates will be competing for the final spot.
If the SEC gets wind of UNC to the B1G, they grab UNC.
 

Online statistics

Members online
451
Guests online
2,769
Total visitors
3,220

Forum statistics

Threads
157,204
Messages
4,088,151
Members
9,983
Latest member
dogsdogsdog


Top Bottom