PAC dysfunction | Page 4 | The Boneyard

PAC dysfunction

Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Messages
5,287
Reaction Score
18,771
Kliavkoff was an absolute disaster.
But he may have been an improvement over Larry Scott.

This didn’t happen overnight. This organization has been choking itself to death for a decade.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
20,556
Reaction Score
44,684
But he may have been an improvement over Larry Scott.

This didn’t happen overnight. This organization has been choking itself to death for a decade. but a good leader would have convince them that the 30 million dollar offer from ESPN was a good offer and warned them of what could happen
100 percent, but a good leader would have convinced them that the 30 million dollar a year offer from ESPN was a good offer if they wanted to stay together and that most likely they would get picked apart if they didn't take it. Instead he went out to get more and came back with a lower, although still decent, deal from apple.
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,170
Reaction Score
33,028

I only saw one reference to an argument by the departing schools that the withdrawal notice provisions are unclear. Is this the basis for the departing schools' justification of their actions? They didn't pull out another agreement or Board Resolutions to justify their insane plan to continue to serve as Directors of an organization they are leaving?
 

KryHavok

Oh yes, UConn IS a BB blueblood!
Joined
Aug 25, 2023
Messages
354
Reaction Score
1,155
Well, this restraining order is at least one (temporary) middle finger from OSU & WSU to the backstabbers.
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2016
Messages
4,068
Reaction Score
9,721
I don't feel bad for any other team other than UConn in CR. I did at one point, cincy, Memphis, temple and cincy landed on their feet they're fine. Stopped feeling bad for Memphis or temple after that.

Does it suck what happened to wsu and osu? Sure, but I don't feel bad for them. I'm sure they'll find a way to land on their feet. Just gotta focus on UConn.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
57,068
Reaction Score
209,416
I don't feel bad for any other team other than UConn in CR. I did at one point, cincy, Memphis, temple and cincy landed on their feet they're fine. Stopped feeling bad for Memphis or temple after that.

Does it suck what happened to wsu and osu? Sure, but I don't feel bad for them. I'm sure they'll find a way to land on their feet. Just gotta focus on UConn.
It looks like they're going to have a pretty decent stack of cash to be able to supplement their operations at least in the near term.
 
Joined
Aug 4, 2016
Messages
1,129
Reaction Score
1,615
I think Washington State and Oregon State should have the rights to the PAC-12 assets, but I don't think the name PAC-12 should live on. Because it's not the PAC-12, even if they call it that. But those two schools definitely deserve whatever the final assets are to the conference.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
20,556
Reaction Score
44,684
I think Washington State and Oregon State should have the rights to the PAC-12 assets, but I don't think the name PAC-12 should live on. Because it's not the PAC-12, even if they call it that. But those two schools definitely deserve whatever the final assets are to the conference.
By that logic no conference should retain their name. Rutgers, Maryland, Washington, Oregon, USC and UCLA, Nebraska, don't exactly make people think Big10.
 
Joined
Feb 4, 2019
Messages
944
Reaction Score
1,435
I don't feel bad for any other team other than UConn in CR. I did at one point, cincy, Memphis, temple and cincy landed on their feet they're fine. Stopped feeling bad for Memphis or temple after that.

Does it suck what happened to wsu and osu? Sure, but I don't feel bad for them. I'm sure they'll find a way to land on their feet. Just gotta focus on UConn.
They have the Mountain West Conference but they feel they are worth more than to stoop to the level of the MWC.
 
Joined
Aug 4, 2016
Messages
1,129
Reaction Score
1,615
By that logic no conference should retain their name. Rutgers, Maryland, Washington, Oregon, USC and UCLA, Nebraska, don't exactly make people think Big10.

But every school that ever was a member is still there (minus U. of Chicago), so it's logical to call it the B1G. Michigan, Ohio State, Wisconsin, etc. are all the legacy schools you think of when you think B1G. Oregon State and Washington State would be the only legacy schools left in the PAC, and they certainly aren't the first names you think of when you think of the PAC.
 
Joined
Aug 4, 2016
Messages
1,129
Reaction Score
1,615
PAC name (might) live on, but apparently none of the employees of the conference plan to stick around........

 
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
5,517
Reaction Score
13,319
I wouldn’t give up the PAC name even if you had to pay off departing members. It will pay dividends in the future . If you have the name you have claim to the history and it’s has triple the brand value of the MW .
OSU/WSU have a right to as original and only continued members
You would have thought UConn‘s fans would understand that as the AAC struggled to maintain its real history when an entirely new Conference assumed it .
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2011
Messages
784
Reaction Score
2,861
I think they want the tourney credits and the PAC network infrastructure.
Isn’t there also a huge payment owed as well? I recall an article that SMU was being considered for PAC only because they could pay that bill. I believe it was comcast. Significant $’s too. Maybe $50-60M
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
765
Reaction Score
1,184

Online statistics

Members online
489
Guests online
3,091
Total visitors
3,580

Forum statistics

Threads
157,137
Messages
4,084,980
Members
9,981
Latest member
Vincent22


Top Bottom