Love but hate? So which is it? You're ok with them? Some of you crack me up. "I love them, but.." "I love my wife, but..."
Lol, I tell women I love you, but I'm not in love with you all the time.
Love but hate? So which is it? You're ok with them? Some of you crack me up. "I love them, but.." "I love my wife, but..."
There's an old adage--be careful what you wish for.
Hmm. Knappe at QB?
The rest of the uni looks a little off, although I can live with it. But my goodness, they took a 3-year old helmet design (the side-profile Nike design when they made the "call of the wild" helmet, although I can't seem to find a picture of it on the web today because it was probably wiped out on purpose) and tooled with it until it was worse. Almost as bad as our previous ones...
I'm not sure these were ever factually proven to be the "Nike alternative" to the "Call of the Wild" design but I think this is what you are referring to:
View attachment 9398
The uniforms aren't bad but the helmets are painfully generic. It's as though people were so split about the Call of the Wild design that Nike basically threw their hands up, said the hell with it, and decided to make the helmets as generic as possible in order to appease the most fans. The red facemasks are a lot to get used to, as well. I'm a Giants fan and the facemasks reminds me too much of the Patriots (probably not an accident, either). The helmets aren't awful, just really, really generic. Maybe time and a good product on the field will get me used to them. I like everything else, though.
Yeah, so much for this poster this spring I guess?I wanted a white facemask and no husky logo. why couldn't we just make it simple. smh
Oregon is Nike's child. The popularity of the Oregon brand sells which is a big reason for the numerous uniforms. UConn football jersey's don't exactly fly off the shelf. So basically Nike isn't going to sweat our design.Well what do you think @FartMan69 ?