New article: XL Center vs Gampel | Page 2 | The Boneyard

New article: XL Center vs Gampel

Status
Not open for further replies.

Waquoit

Mr. Positive
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
32,597
Reaction Score
84,061
Comparing the ECU home game is the epitome of cherry-picking. The players prefer Gampel. The students prefer Gampel. Atmosphere-wise, most people prefer Gampel. There are quotes upon quotes upon quotes that state this.

Two mid-week games in consecutive weeks is cherry-picking? Fail. Are you trying to say that one of the no-name teams was so much more of a power than the other it made a big difference? But what team was the power? The one that played in Gampel and had a 7 point lead at halftime? Or the team that played in the XL got their butts kicked from the opening tap, losing by 25?
 

Stainmaster

Occasionally Constructive
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
22,004
Reaction Score
41,501
Realistic? A new 13,500 seat arena in Storrs is realistic? okay

Totally realistic! Just nuke every acre of property within Storrs's boundaries and build on top of the rubble. </sarcasm>
 

Fishy

Elite Premium Poster
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
18,139
Reaction Score
131,978
This continues to be the dumbest argument in the entirety of the UConn universe.

The buildings are inanimate. They just sit there. When empty, they are both just as quiet as Babbidge.

You can have a great atmosphere at XL. You can have a great atmosphere at Gampel. You can have a crappy atmosphere at both.

The people that go to one are the exactly same people that go to the other - the biggest and most important variable tends to be the opponent.

With a good opponent, both places are fine.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2011
Messages
80
Reaction Score
134
This continues to be the dumbest argument in the entirety of the UConn universe.

The buildings are inanimate. They just sit there. When empty, they are both just as quiet as Babbidge.

You can have a great atmosphere at XL. You can have a great atmosphere at Gampel. You can have a crappy atmosphere at both.

The people that go to one are the exactly same people that go to the other - the biggest and most important variable tends to be the opponent.

With a good opponent, both places are fine.
You forgot one other important variable: The students!! More students go to Gampel games, a lot more. Which makes for the better atmosphere.
 

August_West

Universal remote, put it down on docking station.
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
51,384
Reaction Score
89,540
Fishy said:
This continues to be the dumbest argument in the entirety of the UConn universe. The buildings are inanimate. They just sit there. When empty, they are both just as quiet as Babbidge. You can have a great atmosphere at XL. You can have a great atmosphere at Gampel. You can have a crappy atmosphere at both. The people that go to one are the exactly same people that go to the other - the biggest and most important variable tends to be the opponent. With a good opponent, both places are fine.


Except msg. MSG is not an inanimate building. It is bathed in the magic of Wicca. Except for the Knicks, wiccans hate the Knicks.

But that room DOES have a vibe, not just for sports but for music too. Way too many athletes and performers have spoken about it to discount.


I do agree with your gampel/XL point though.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2011
Messages
7,188
Reaction Score
8,765
Two points.

First, one of the reasons Gampel has a better 'reputation' than the XL is where the student section is. XL has a few floor seats and the pep band with everyone else up on the 3rd deck. Gampel has the entire section behind the visitor's hoop filled with students. It's an easy fix; but the loss of money will keep the XL from making any changes.

Second, expanding Gampel will be difficult and costly. There are classrooms under the floors and stands and the pool is under part of the south stands. Not an engineer; but, I would not be surprised if building a new arena would be cheaper. Very unlikely that UConn can afford 2 arenas, thus a dual purpose area, while not idea, is likely more feasible.
 

Waquoit

Mr. Positive
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
32,597
Reaction Score
84,061
Hartford's problems are Hartford's problem.

Playing games in Hartford isn't about doing a solid for Hartford, it's about doing what's best for the program.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
27,124
Reaction Score
66,681
We've only managed 4 NC playing the way we currently do.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
57,257
Reaction Score
210,258
Playing games in Hartford isn't about doing a solid for Hartford, it's about doing what's best for the program.
It's a little of both and should be. The tricky part is in weighting those two interest when the don't align.

I'd love to see gross and net figures at both Gampel and the XL. I suspect that the XL needs to be about 3/4 full for games there to be profitable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
377
Guests online
2,608
Total visitors
2,985

Forum statistics

Threads
157,338
Messages
4,094,882
Members
9,985
Latest member
stanfordnyc


Top Bottom