So we get more exposure from Michigan fans and "NYC media" if the game is in NYC? Who cares? You know what would give UConn exposure that would dwarf that tiny bump? Beating Michigan. And that has a much better chance of happening at The Rent.
I don't normally consider you an idiot, and generally agree with a lot of what you said, but you either: 1. clearly lack a fundamental understanding of what I said in my initial post,
or 2. You are attempting to manipulate what I said to try and prove a point, which I don't even entirely understand in the first place.
Read my first post, I was responding to a simple question posed by Palatine "What does Michigan gain", to which I said "Exposure".
Now in case it's your reading comprehension that is at issue, allow me to elaborate and clear up what I mean by that in case you can't put it together. By playing in front of a large amount of alumni in NYC, Michigan may be hoping to gain exposure to a market that is, as of yet, untapped. This could lead them to make more money, be it through donations, future contracts to split gates with (fill in a team) in NYC, etc.
Never did I say anything about UConn gaining exposure through playing in NYC (although its not a terrible idea). I actually agree with your assertion that a great way to gain exposure is through winning games. Again, I never made any assertions about UConn in my post, it was directly solely to Palatines comment regarding Michigan.
Is that better? Are you understanding what I'm trying to say, or will you attempt to continue to point out flaws in my argument that do not exist.
