First-round NCAA upsets, by year and by seed | The Boneyard

First-round NCAA upsets, by year and by seed

Plebe

La verdad no peca pero incomoda
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
19,393
Reaction Score
69,717
I posted this table in the game thread, but I've since updated it with this year's results and I also added a column showing the total number of first-round "upsets" (defined as a win by the lower-seeded team) per year.

This marks the 25th year of the 64-team women's NCAA tournament, so the percentages at the bottom are nice and even.

Data entries represent the winning percentage of the higher-seeded teams (e.g., "0.75" for the 5 vs. 12 would mean that three of the #5 seeds won their first-round game).

upload_2018-3-17_21-4-39.png
 

Nuyoika

Destroyer of Baked Goods
Joined
Sep 22, 2014
Messages
1,607
Reaction Score
3,370
I know this is a lot to ask but is this going to be progressive through each round of the tourney... and can you add a column that indicates conference as well?
 

Plebe

La verdad no peca pero incomoda
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
19,393
Reaction Score
69,717
I know this is a lot to ask but is this going to be progressive through each round of the tourney... and can you add a column that indicates conference as well?
Ha yes it's a lot to ask ;)

I'd like to do it for subsequent rounds; we'll see.

Not sure what you mean by "a column that indicates conference"? How would one indicate conference in just a single column?
 

Nuyoika

Destroyer of Baked Goods
Joined
Sep 22, 2014
Messages
1,607
Reaction Score
3,370
Ha yes it's a lot to ask ;)

I'd like to do it for subsequent rounds; we'll see.

Not sure what you mean by "a column that indicates conference"? How would one indicate conference in just a single column?
After looking at your sheet again I realize my request was insane lol. That is a ton of work. I will work on a sheet tomorrow. I wanted to track how certain conferences do over the long haul and the talent in the top 16. I have just been lazy lol.
 
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
16,671
Reaction Score
65,595
In 1998 which #16 seed beat #1 seed? Thanks.
 

Plebe

La verdad no peca pero incomoda
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
19,393
Reaction Score
69,717
After looking at your sheet again I realize my request was insane lol. That is a ton of work. I will work on a sheet tomorrow. I wanted to track how certain conferences do over the long haul and the talent in the top 16. I have just been lazy lol.
Yeah that would have to be a separate spreadsheet entirely. I'd want to track two different variables: each conference's overall winning percentage in all tournament games and their performance vis-à-vis their seeding. Certainly doable but will take some work.
 

LETTERL

Pack Leader
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
3,982
Reaction Score
6,415
98
Harvard over Stanford

Yes...Harvard beat Stanford. Allison Feaster was fantastic.

I have always thought that game should have an asterisk next to it. Stanford was the #1 seed, for sure, and had an outstanding season...but if I recall correctly, two of their stars were injured and did not play in that historic upset.
 

nwhoopfan

hopeless West Coast homer
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Messages
29,069
Reaction Score
54,242
I have always thought that game should have an asterisk next to it. Stanford was the #1 seed, for sure, and had an outstanding season...but if I recall correctly, two of their stars were injured and did not play in that historic upset.

That is correct.
 

bballnut90

LV Adherent. Topic Crafter
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
7,058
Reaction Score
30,824
Yes...Harvard beat Stanford. Allison Feaster was fantastic.

I have always thought that game should have an asterisk next to it. Stanford was the #1 seed, for sure, and had an outstanding season...but if I recall correctly, two of their stars were injured and did not play in that historic upset.

Agreed. Harvard was badly underseeded and Stanford was a 21-5 team that somehow nabbed a 1 seed. They were without their best player, Kristin Folkl, who helped turn their season around. With Folkl they went 19-1, without her they went 2-5.
 

KnightBridgeAZ

Grand Canyon Knight
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,268
Reaction Score
8,839
Agreed. Harvard was badly underseeded and Stanford was a 21-5 team that somehow nabbed a 1 seed. They were without their best player, Kristin Folkl, who helped turn their season around. With Folkl they went 19-1, without her they went 2-5.
Yes, but IIRC both the unexpected losses happened late. One in the conference tourney (which purportedly they didn't completely divulge) and the other in practice after they were seeded.

Feaster was a beast. I just heard from a friend that she went on to an almost 20 year pro career, mostly overseas.
 

Wally East

Posting via the Speed Force
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Messages
1,467
Reaction Score
3,680
The sharp drop from 4 vs 13 to 5 vs 12 shows what a big difference home court makes.

Great work!
 

Online statistics

Members online
627
Guests online
5,180
Total visitors
5,807

Forum statistics

Threads
157,034
Messages
4,078,078
Members
9,973
Latest member
WillngtnOak


Top Bottom