dook doesn't look like the dook of old

[Tenspro2002]

I have to say, looking at their starting lineup, if you erased the name on the front of the jersey, you couldn't tell this was dook. Three freshmen, zero white guys. Is this really dook? They're basically indistinguishable from Kentucky.

 

[Stainmaster]

I have to say, looking at their starting lineup, if you erased the name on the front of the jersey, you couldn't tell this was dook. Three freshmen, zero white guys. Is this really dook? They're basically indistinguishable from Kentucky.

6th man is a white guy, as is next year's top recruit. K seems to be blending the old with the new.

 

[alexd]

I have to say, looking at their starting lineup, if you erased the name on the front of the jersey, you couldn't tell this was dook. Three freshmen, zero white guys. Is this really dook? They're basically indistinguishable from Kentucky.

Dook didn't start any "white guys" when we played them in 2004. Same thing in 1999.

 

[msgordon]

redick

 

[John]

Dook didn't start any "white guys" when we played them in 2004. Same thing in 1999.

1999 langdon

 

[Edward Sargent]

I have to say, looking at their starting lineup, if you erased the name on the front of the jersey, you couldn't tell this was dook. Three freshmen, zero white guys. Is this really dook? They're basically indistinguishable from Kentucky.

Who's that kid Allen - looks like he might make white guy status by next year!

 

[BigErnMcCracken]

1999 langdon

Huh?

 

[nomar]

Huh?

Hey, if you add Langdon & Battier together, you do get 1 white starter.

Not sure how Alex forgot about Redick in 2004.

 

[John]

Huh?

I remember him as white

http://www.dukeupdate.com/Seasons/19981999_duke_blue_devils.htm

 

[alexd]

[QUOTE="nomar, post: 1288475, member:

Not sure how Alex forgot about Redick in 2004.[/QUOTE]

Okay...so that's 9 out of 10 starters between the 1999 and 2004 teams.