OT: - Confusing coaching strategy | The Boneyard

OT: Confusing coaching strategy

Joined
Nov 27, 2011
Messages
67
Reaction Score
332
I just finished watching a game between Rutgers and Nebraska men. Although I am not a student of the finer points of basketball, I am struggling to understand a strategy that cost Nebraska the game. With about 61 seconds left in the game Nebraska had the ball with a 3 point lead. The point guard held the ball until 6 seconds remained on the shot clock, tried to make a drive and coughed the ball up. Rutgers came down, was fouled and hit 2 shots making it a 1 point game. Nebraska came back, milked the clock to 9 seconds and coughed it up again. Rutgers came back, hit a put-back bucket to win. It's the same strategy as "prevent defense" in football - it should be called "prevent offense". In both cases, as many times as not, it prevents a victory.
 

JordyG

Stake in my pocket, Vlad to see you
Joined
Jan 21, 2016
Messages
13,103
Reaction Score
54,870
I just finished watching a game between Rutgers and Nebraska men. Although I am not a student of the finer points of basketball, I am struggling to understand a strategy that cost Nebraska the game. With about 61 seconds left in the game Nebraska had the ball with a 3 point lead. The point guard held the ball until 6 seconds remained on the shot clock, tried to make a drive and coughed the ball up. Rutgers came down, was fouled and hit 2 shots making it a 1 point game. Nebraska came back, milked the clock to 9 seconds and coughed it up again. Rutgers came back, hit a put-back bucket to win. It's the same strategy as "prevent defense" in football - it should be called "prevent offense". In both cases, as many times as not, it prevents a victory.
Seen all too often.
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2013
Messages
594
Reaction Score
1,040
I just finished watching a game between Rutgers and Nebraska men. Although I am not a student of the finer points of basketball, I am struggling to understand a strategy that cost Nebraska the game. With about 61 seconds left in the game Nebraska had the ball with a 3 point lead. The point guard held the ball until 6 seconds remained on the shot clock, tried to make a drive and coughed the ball up. Rutgers came down, was fouled and hit 2 shots making it a 1 point game. Nebraska came back, milked the clock to 9 seconds and coughed it up again. Rutgers came back, hit a put-back bucket to win. It's the same strategy as "prevent defense" in football - it should be called "prevent offense". In both cases, as many times as not, it prevents a victory.
That style got them the lead but did not get them a win. Ultimately Rutgers sophomore guard Corey Sanders made play after play in the 2nd half to get the win for Rutgers. He looks like the real deal. Congratulations to former UConn player and asst coach Steve Pikell on his first Big 10 win as Rutgers HC.
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2016
Messages
578
Reaction Score
1,474
I have no problem with the strategy, it was execution that cost Nebraska the game. I did not see the game....milking the clock makes sense, however you need to start your offense with at least 10 seconds on the clock
 

Online statistics

Members online
629
Guests online
4,997
Total visitors
5,626

Forum statistics

Threads
156,994
Messages
4,075,941
Members
9,965
Latest member
deltaop99


Top Bottom