That equates to about a 5 seed.I say we go 14-4. Undefeated OOC. 27-4, win conference tourney. 30-4 1 seed?
we only have two rivalries in this league that go back more than 2 years and we don't play both those teams home and home? Outrageous!
Huh? We play Cincy twice Home and on the road. I guess you are talking about USF which I don't care playing twice anyhow. We don't have a rivalry with ECU. LOL!we only have two rivalries in this league that go back more than 2 years and we don't play both those teams home and home? Outrageous!
Well you mentioned two teams in your post!I was talking about USF and I was just kidding. I couldn't care less!
Well you mentioned two teams in your post!
Agreed. At East Carolina is a tricky game so I am glad we avoid that. We only played Houston once last year so we were going to have to play them twice this year.This was the best case scenario for us. I kind of like how our schedule is shaping up for next year, our strength of schedule could be pretty good especially if we go far in Atlantis
I guess you are right and I was not very clear. This is why I usually get heckled when I try to tell jokes.
I thought it was great if for no other reason than that I knew it would lead to Boneyard posters not getting it and being confused. Seems I was right.
Well, lawyer up. Half the board will die from alcohol poisoning now.I'll never stop being surprised at how dense people act on here sometimes. The post was clear and obviously a joke. At a board I used to post on, we had a rule that you owed someone a beer if you took their joke post seriously. Maybe we should institute that here.
Yeah - the smart funny half - imagine what will be left....Well, lawyer up. Half the board will die from alcohol poisoning now.
It's at least a 3 seed. I'm assuming your joking?That equates to about a 5 seed.
No. I assume he thinks--given how the AAC has been treated by the NCAA--that teams will always be underseeded.It's at least a 3 seed. I'm assuming your joking?
My thinking as well. Going into this past season there was a lot of evidence the AAC was going to have a down year with the better schools losing a lot of important players from the previous season. It looks to be the opposite next year. Of course the conference has to demonstrate things against the OOC opponents to support our opinion. I expect that to happen and as you point out the bottom should make a significant improvement from last season.No. I assume he thinks--given how the AAC has been treated by the NCAA--that teams will always be underseeded.
There's no way a 30-4 team gets a 5 seed with UConn's OOC schedule unless they lost all their key OOC games and the AAC is worse than we're thinking. The bottom of the league should be better this year, and I think the league is more than serviceable. That will be the difference: 1-2 sub-200 teams rather than 5.
so, what seed would Gonzaga get with the same profile? I say a 2 or 3 seed. Since we are a mid major now, we remind me of Gonzagas situation a bit.My thinking as well. Going into this past season there was a lot of evidence the AAC was going to have a down year with the better schools losing a lot of important players from the previous season. It looks to be the opposite next year. Of course the conference has to demonstrate things against the OOC opponents to support our opinion. I expect that to happen and as you point out the bottom should make a significant improvement from last season.