- Joined
- Dec 2, 2011
- Messages
- 817
- Reaction Score
- 1,144
It makes a ton of sense and levels the playing ground. Whats going on at Kentucky and Duke is not reasonable and doesnt provide a fair playing ground
College teams shouldn't be allowed to make the tournament in back to back years. I mean come on, give someone else a chance.
They could all play the same position.I understand that the numbers don’t tell the whole story but how do you mess up if you have 1, 2 and 3?
Except UConn because you guys wouldn't even make the tournament. However, under my suggestion UConn probably would get in. See I'm always looking out for the little guys. Programs like UConn (and other mid and low tier AAC schools) are getting screwed in the current system.or we can put Cincinnati in every year and then EVERYONE has a chance to win an NCAA tourney game
Considering Cronin is your coach that is obvious.See I'm always looking out for the little guys.
Except UConn because you guys wouldn't even make the tournament. However, under my suggestion UConn probably would get in. See I'm always looking out for the little guys. Programs like UConn (and other mid and low tier AAC schools) are getting screwed in the current system.
All of them. Making the Final Four is tough which is why you should go ahead and give Ollie a lifetime deal for getting to one.Serious question. Because we don't know what it's like.
How many consecutive appearances would you trade for a sniff at a final four?
It makes a ton of sense and levels the playing ground. Whats going on at Kentucky and Duke is not reasonable and doesnt provide a fair playing ground