I saw a comment above about guessing who is in our camp and who is against us, but I'm not scrolling back up to hit reply. If I would venture a guess, I'm going to guess the following:
Oklahoma: Wants expansion, obviously. Likes us. Would probably be willing to compromise and take UC and BYU over us if the three of us all bear out closely in television analysis. Would not substitute any other candidate but BYU/Cincy for us is my inclination, but would vote yes for us if it were put as a yes/no question.
WVU: Firmly in the exapansion camp. Likes us. Would be less willing than OU to substitute BYU for us for travel reasons, but would probably be willing to substitute Memphis, or a directional Florida for us if asked to. Would vote yes for us if asked.
Kansas: On the fence on expansion. Is willing to compromise and expand if the right schools are taken. Chatter I've read has said that UC and us are the two they would prefer and are seen as acceptable if expansion has to happen, but they'd rather not expand if it isn't necessary. If there's a yes/no vote on us, they'd vote yes.
Kansas St.: See Kansas, although they seem, based on Cincinnati emails, that they're a bit more inclined to expand. Yes on us, with reservation.
Iowa St.: Another fence rider. Haven't heard much from them. If I had to guess, they'd stick with KU and vote as they do. Swing vote but if OU, KU and the like are championing us, it'll be a yes.
OSU: Mostly crickets in Stillwater. I'd be willing to say that as OU goes, the Cowboys go. Yes on us if BYU is not on the table.
That brings us to Texas.
Texas: Firmly anti-expansion. Would be persuaded to expand only if monetary considerations are made their way. I get the idea that they're totally OK with staying as close to Texas with the teams in the league as they can possibly be so Houston may be appealing here. The only way they're willing to bring in an outpost like UConn is if they can't be the king of conference payouts without having the NYC DMA. If a compromise is reached and their bottom line isn't hurt by the LHN transitioning to a conference network (ie. A network is created and even without NYC/northeast the network still pays them what they make now- even if it's an imbalanced revenue distribution.) we would be off the table for them. They'd go in the direction of Houston or directional Florida. If the only way they make more or the same money by having a conference network is by adding NYC, they'll do it, but they will exhaust every avenue before signing off. We are a no for them as it stands now.
Texas Tech: Red Raiders definitely would be trying to keep in Texas' good graces. They don't like that they're not profiting off a network while Texas does anymore than anyone else but don't want to upset big brother. They're a no for us at the moment but they'll swing yes quickly if we add the money that no one else can.
Baylor: Badly needs a network. If this league implodes they have few options. TCU would be scooped up before they would be due to proximity to Dallas. Would certainly like to keep playing nice with Texas but with their own future on the line, they're going to end up siding with Oklahoma. They got into BXII on a compromise to begin with. They don't want this league to fall apart. Candidates would likely be sticking point for them but I don't see them being in a strong enough position to go against a candidate OU is pushing if the TV money backs that candidate up.
TCU: See Baylor.
In all, in a vacuum, I think we are safely looking at OU, OSU, KU, KSU, WVU and ISU saying yes to us if it's a simple yes/no. Baylor and TCU are next in line to shift that way followed by TTU and finally Texas. Problem is that it's not a simple yes/no. There will be suggestions made to substitute one school for another and many of the schools on the list would just as soon vote for a UC/BYU combo if the money is in the same ballpark.
We need to hope our TV analysis blows theirs out of the water so much so that subsituting us seems like a silly proposition.