- Joined
- Apr 13, 2015
- Messages
- 533
- Reaction Score
- 3,300
Just went to Nan's great Link's post. Thanks Nan for doing the leg work. Maybe it's me, but it seems more media outlets are charging for the information (articles.) Are you paying the piper? I am not. Whether it is the inconvenience (give me all your personal info to get registered) or the inconvenience of paying the 17 cents or 75 cents or the inconvenience of (Did I say inconvenience again.) I was a paper boy in Philly (The Bulletin, which was an afternoon paper) and I am not paying and will not get involved in the inconvenient situation.
Part too (for Kibitzer & Co.) I don't think the articles are worth the money (17cents?) and definitely not the inconvenience. This is my first thread created and submitted so here is what pushed me over the edge.
The Republican put out an article "5 questions for UConn women." The lead or teaser (nah!) said the first big question was whether Nurse could bring into this season her tremendous, over the top, outstanding, and stupendous summer experience--scoring 33 on the USA--etc.
I'll keep this short to finish. This is not a big question for me. All I know and care about is--Is Nurse better than last year? Of course she is! NEXT! It was clear the article was not worth 17 cents.
Part too (for Kibitzer & Co.) I don't think the articles are worth the money (17cents?) and definitely not the inconvenience. This is my first thread created and submitted so here is what pushed me over the edge.
The Republican put out an article "5 questions for UConn women." The lead or teaser (nah!) said the first big question was whether Nurse could bring into this season her tremendous, over the top, outstanding, and stupendous summer experience--scoring 33 on the USA--etc.
I'll keep this short to finish. This is not a big question for me. All I know and care about is--Is Nurse better than last year? Of course she is! NEXT! It was clear the article was not worth 17 cents.