- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 8,266
- Reaction Score
- 22,629
According to Waylon, UConn isn't good enough for the ACC.
According to Waylon, Quse/Pitt aren't good enough for the Big East.
According to the ACC, Pitt and Quse are good enough for the ACC.
Can anyone follow this logic?
We're not good enough for the ACC, but we're good enough to keep the Big East together after losing two schools to a conference that we can't get into, even though those two schools dragged the conference down anyway.
And in conclusion, Waylon believes this board wants to fold up UConn because we think we're better off competing in the ACC than the new Conference USA.
Waylon:
According to Waylon, Quse/Pitt aren't good enough for the Big East.
According to the ACC, Pitt and Quse are good enough for the ACC.
Can anyone follow this logic?
We're not good enough for the ACC, but we're good enough to keep the Big East together after losing two schools to a conference that we can't get into, even though those two schools dragged the conference down anyway.
And in conclusion, Waylon believes this board wants to fold up UConn because we think we're better off competing in the ACC than the new Conference USA.
Waylon: