Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="hoophuskee, post: 4489934, member: 3535"] I've felt for a long time Meg and Kara extremely overly favor slowing the game down quite a bit (not completely) and play slower basketball. I don’t agree with their philosophy at all. As Kara said in her postgame she wants the team to play inside-out. That's her preference (and imo it's Meg's too), but that's not Geno’s in the manner they want. And I prefer Geno's. So the last 3 years the best offense would have been dumping the ball to our posts rather than playing more as a perimeter team in which we had A/A talent on the perimeter? IMO if there is a fantasy discussion - it will be one way (as it should be); Geno's way. The same way that has gotten UCONN so may titles and so many final fours and so many super recruits. I'm not sure if this is considered on-topic for the thread - but I'm referring to this game and then the games that follow and specifically Kara's postgame comments: -->Anyhow for this game- what did you think of Cd's running player’s in and out (which Kara loved and maybe Meg loves too) vs Kara's comments that the team chemistry isn't quite there because they haven’t played as much resulting in higher turnovers? SO how is benching your starters that have been injured so much of the season thus far making them better by sitting them on the bench? How does in-and-out help chemistry? Overall I didn't mind the in-and-out today after losing Edwards. Too much was lost so whatever was done was fine. I just disagree with Kara's and MEg's philosophy vs Geno's. As for CD, I'd like to see if she would hold to a much larger bench philsophy if she was coaching many games through the NCAA Tourney. The few games she does it- is fine. [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach