XLCenterFan
CT, NE
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2018
- Messages
- 3,539
- Reaction Score
- 13,456
Early number is us -7. I mean, we covered 8 vs Creighton and 15 vs Butler, but wow.
Must be the gampel effect.Early number is us -7. I mean, we covered 8 vs Creighton and 15 vs Butler, but wow.
Not touching, I imagine it will be a close game all the way to the end.Early number is us -7. I mean, we covered 8 vs Creighton and 15 vs Butler, but wow.
I meant x not making 19 more FTsMaybe they are counting on X making 19 more free throws than we do
It is. What do you think it should be and how much are you putting on Xavier?Is that really the line? Cmon. No way.
Vegas probably just fired all their statisticians and just created a model to say "whatever Kenpom has +/- 1" and now they're making out like banditsKenpom has UConn by 8.*
Barttorvik has UConn by 10.
Haslametrics has UConn by 8.
All of the advanced metrics still like UConn more than Xavier and it is really as simple as that. Vegas power rankings and the analytical website rankings are always pretty similar.
The running joke on Vegas Twitter is that they put out opening lines and totals that are eerily similar to KP projections.
Totally seems like a trap. Most will pound X at that number. And maybe Vegas wants that, knowing we should cover in Storrs. It’s like when NFL lines open up and you see a line you love. Whole country did the same thing and you all lose together.It's a set up for people to hammer Xavier. Vegas isn't giving a very solid team like Xavier all them points for nothing. Classic Vegas move. Uconn covers but I wouldn't touch it
Vegas probably just fired all their statisticians and just created a model to say "whatever Kenpom has +/- 1" and now they're making out like bandits
I hope it not a death kissKenpom has UConn by 8.*
Barttorvik has UConn by 10.
Haslametrics has UConn by 8.
All of the advanced metrics still like UConn more than Xavier and it is really as simple as that. Vegas power rankings and the analytical website rankings are always pretty similar.
The running joke on Vegas Twitter is that they put out opening lines and totals that are eerily similar to KP projections.
Yup, I miss those daysAs the story goes, the early KP users were able to make a killing on totals before books started opening the O/Us within a couple of points of most KP projections.
Why would they do that? If you’re making book, you want the bets to come in 50-50. You lose money if the bets come in heavily on one team, and they cover the spreadIt's a set up for people to hammer Xavier. Vegas isn't giving a very solid team like Xavier all them points for nothing. Classic Vegas move. Uconn covers but I wouldn't touch it
You aren’t kidding. Made a killing it wasn’t until conference play when the books started dialing it in. There were some totals that would have 10 point swings in the early days from open to closeAs the story goes, the early KP users were able to make a killing on totals before books started opening the O/Us within a couple of points of most KP projections.
BookmarkedIt is. What do you think it should be and how much are you putting on Xavier?
Doesn’t matter he won’t respond if UConn covers, none of these betas doBookmarked
Only explanation is that they read my Haiku and know the mojo will be strong.Early number is us -7. I mean, we covered 8 vs Creighton and 15 vs Butler, but wow.
According to a complex mojo formula that I utilize to determine whether or not, I may haiku, I currently am in a no haiku cycle.Only explanation is that they read my Haiku and know the mojo will be strong.