Why would he be a logical successor if they had bad seasons? Wouldn't he be partially responsible?
If Diaco wants him hire him. If he wants someone else so be it.
Based on Weist's comments it doesn't seem like it's happening anyway.
what comments did weist make?Why would he be a logical successor if they had bad seasons? Wouldn't he be partially responsible?
If Diaco wants him hire him. If he wants someone else so be it.
Based on Weist's comments it doesn't seem like it's happening anyway.
Any GOOD manager is primarily focused on the people that work for him. He ought to be looking for and grooming his successor(s) from day one. He ought to be getting his staff the experiences, training, development they need to go on to something better for their own careers. That builds trust and teamwork. If he's worried about someone replacing him, he shouldn't be in the position in the first place.This, but based on his body of work, he looks like a good candidate for OC if BD wants him. The only issue would be the effect his presence would have on the locker room if certain players don't warm up to BD and prefer TJ. It depends entirely on the relationship. On the football side, he was part of the Cincy offense BD wants to run, has done well with the WR, and shown some good things as OC once TJ the HC let him loose. Shown a lot by keeping the team together.
Ultimately, it's Bob's decision and I'm good with whatever he decides. I would be happy to have TJ return, but I'm also not worried about his future if he doesn't. He'll land somewhere fairly quickly.
Body of work? Running the offense he's 3-8. Now everyone will chirp in that he wasn't really running the offense all year but unless you have concrete evidence that he wasn't you have to hang that 3-8 record on him too. Saying that, I'm sure he's a better coach than that record indicates but let Diaco pick his own crew. He'll either sink or swim with them so lets see what this guy comes up with. Gotta give him the benefit of a doubt till he proves himself wrong just like I did with Coach P.
Knowing that he is a logical successor if you have a bad season or two. It's like bringing an instant coaching controversy onto the staff.
Body of work? Running the offense he's 3-8. Now everyone will chirp in that he wasn't really running the offense all year but unless you have concrete evidence that he wasn't you have to hang that 3-8 record on him too. Saying that, I'm sure he's a better coach than that record indicates but let Diaco pick his own crew. He'll either sink or swim with them so lets see what this guy comes up with. Gotta give him the benefit of a doubt till he proves himself wrong just like I did with Coach P.
Body of work? Running the offense he's 3-8. Now everyone will chirp in that he wasn't really running the offense all year but unless you have concrete evidence that he wasn't you have to hang that 3-8 record on him too. Saying that, I'm sure he's a better coach than that record indicates but let Diaco pick his own crew. He'll either sink or swim with them so lets see what this guy comes up with. Gotta give him the benefit of a doubt till he proves himself wrong just like I did with Coach P.
I don't know. Excuse me for a minute while I create a new thread about it...Interesting question, has this been discussed before on the Boneyard?
Okay, I'll play Devil's advocate on this thread:
TJ showed himself to be a strong leader of people. He showed the energy and charisma that the troops needed to rally behind, and he was able to get the water out of a sinking ship. But was he really the OC? By some reports, the thee game winning streak happened while Shane Day was calling the plays, not TJ.
TJ is a very good leader, and many know that he was my fall-back position as head coach if our main targets weren't hired. But as an OC? I'm just not sure. Hopefully, Diaco will have more certainty in his pick for OC than I do...
While Day may have called the plays I'd guess TJ developed the game plan, which probably gave Day the situational play calling chart.