Both Phil and Alex make some good points regarding "what if". But I'm not sure if any of the recruiting "dominos" would have actually fallen. I'm not sure how EDD's departure date matches with Kelly's verbal (which one came first), but I doubt Kelly's decision was affected either way. Given the position EDD plays, I'm also doubtful that Samarie, Stef, Michala, Lauren or Bria would have made different decisions. Perhaps Lauren might have at the time, but I don't think the others would have. But I'm just guessing.
And then freshmen coming in - KML, Banks and Stokes - doesn't seem like their decision would have been effected either. But we will never know - all just speculation. I'm betting EDD would have been more fit and strong had she come to UCONN, and certainly would have scored less points. It would have been an unprecedented run and I'm betting Alex is right in that we would already have NC #10 or 11 if she'd been at UCONN for 4 years...
The biggest impact the recruitment of EDD had was on HER class - Geno held a schollie for her at the expense of others he could have been recruiting. I think Sykes ended up no great shakes, but Chelsey Lee wanted to play with her and Sykes was supposedly interested in UCONN. If EDD made her mind up sooner, possibly we could have landed Sykes, and then Lee may have followed. Just WAG's on my part tho...
I do disagree that a 100-something win streak would have been "bad" for the game. I don't mean this directed at Alex, but at the UCONN haters who felt the 90 game streak was "bad" for the game. What a bunch of hogwash. This past year ESPN and the NCAAW promoted the snot out of the "3 to see". How much did it raise the consciousness of the average fan? Not much. But a streak of 170 games would have put UCONN on ESPN almost after every single game. Sure people might have gotten "sick" of the success, but it certainly would have been way more newsworthy than any other WCBB story over the past 4 years... Bad for the game? Only if you are a UCONN hater...