- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 9,381
- Reaction Score
- 23,714
It sure seems like this one could go either way - I could certainly envision a scenario where the anchors known as Seton Hall, Providence, DePaul, and even St. Johns to an extent suffocate the conference into irrelevency. Georgetown and Marquette are nice programs, but they're not your prototypical sexy matchups every team circles on their calender before the season.
I think this conference will be successful, though, and the main reason is coaching. John Thompson, Jay Wright, Buzz Williams, and even Steve Lavin at least seem to have a general idea on how to build a program and sustain success. Thompson and Williams generally have disciplined teams who execute well and understand how to manage the limitations of their talent. Wright is an enigma who can thrive with the right roster and self-combust with the wrong one, and Lavin is a charasmic salesman who's been reeling in the recruits and working the New York City pipelines. As a coach, he leaves a lot to be desired, but he's not quite Scott Drew bad, either. Providence has a solid foundation, a coach who has shown signs of being a good recruiter, and a moderately passionate fanbase. I think they'll make the tournament next year and possibly morth into a relevent program depending on whether Cooley sticks around.
These five programs by themselves aren't going to be anything special, but what happens if they add a few more schools? I don't pay attention to conference re-alignment as much as you guys do, but I've heard rumblings of Butler, VCU, Creighton, and Temple. If you add three of those schools, suuddenly you've got two of the best young coaches in America on your payroll, plus three of the best mid-majors in the country. Does that not become a 5-6 bid league, or a rich man's version of the A-10? I realize football is the cash cow here, but it's been proven in the past that great coaching can overcome a lot.
Clearly, if this all comes to fruition, the Catholic Conference would be a preferable destination to whatever the Big East looks like now. Is it a realistic option? Probably not. Still, this seems like the first time in the programs history where there is a conflict of interest between football fans and basketball fans (unless, of course, you believe the BCS schools will eventually branch off and teams like Providence and Seton Hall will virtually become D-2 schools).
So I guess, the question then becomes, "can you sustain a top-notch basketball program without football?" Most people seem to be saying no, but I'm not sure I agree. I could probably be convinced otherwise, though.
Thoughts?
I think this conference will be successful, though, and the main reason is coaching. John Thompson, Jay Wright, Buzz Williams, and even Steve Lavin at least seem to have a general idea on how to build a program and sustain success. Thompson and Williams generally have disciplined teams who execute well and understand how to manage the limitations of their talent. Wright is an enigma who can thrive with the right roster and self-combust with the wrong one, and Lavin is a charasmic salesman who's been reeling in the recruits and working the New York City pipelines. As a coach, he leaves a lot to be desired, but he's not quite Scott Drew bad, either. Providence has a solid foundation, a coach who has shown signs of being a good recruiter, and a moderately passionate fanbase. I think they'll make the tournament next year and possibly morth into a relevent program depending on whether Cooley sticks around.
These five programs by themselves aren't going to be anything special, but what happens if they add a few more schools? I don't pay attention to conference re-alignment as much as you guys do, but I've heard rumblings of Butler, VCU, Creighton, and Temple. If you add three of those schools, suuddenly you've got two of the best young coaches in America on your payroll, plus three of the best mid-majors in the country. Does that not become a 5-6 bid league, or a rich man's version of the A-10? I realize football is the cash cow here, but it's been proven in the past that great coaching can overcome a lot.
Clearly, if this all comes to fruition, the Catholic Conference would be a preferable destination to whatever the Big East looks like now. Is it a realistic option? Probably not. Still, this seems like the first time in the programs history where there is a conflict of interest between football fans and basketball fans (unless, of course, you believe the BCS schools will eventually branch off and teams like Providence and Seton Hall will virtually become D-2 schools).
So I guess, the question then becomes, "can you sustain a top-notch basketball program without football?" Most people seem to be saying no, but I'm not sure I agree. I could probably be convinced otherwise, though.
Thoughts?