Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="diggerfoot, post: 3386336, member: 1673"] After reading this thread I went to one PDF boxscore to check on what I suspected were additional anomalies, but that particular boxscore did not have +/-. Perhaps you could fill me in? Despite having an abysmal line in terms of stats, I am certain Irwin had a better +/- than ONO, fairly certain it was better than Griffin and it may even have been better than Walker. I also think Irwin's play in the first half (particularly with screening) is reflective of her +/-, though her play in the second half is reflective of her stat line. [/QUOTE]