Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="8893, post: 2575043, member: 93"] I remember seeing that in there at the time and thinking it was a very unusual clause. And [USER=71]@FfldCntyFan[/USER] is absolutely right we were stripped of that “protection” once Warde left, hence the need to have a new contract to lock Ollie down, because that’s what the conventional wisdom was at the time. No doubt that clause played a key role and it is curious that it was there to begin with. Without knowing more I’d just say good negotiating by KO and his people and really bad negotiating by whoever was doing our bidding, but I’m not seeing anything illegal or unethical about it. Are you being hyperbolic or do you see something more than just ineptitude? [/QUOTE]