Because he doesnt do anything at all when hes in. Hes been pretty bad this year. For him it all comes down to effort and intensity. When he plays with neither, hes not very good.Getting fewer and fewer minutes...
Roscoe cant play the 3 tho and thats becoming an issue as it really jams things up at the 4 and 5 and leaves only DD really at the 3. Daniels has to do more than 3 pts in 35 min tho. 2 subpar games from him in a row. I realize Oriakhi didnt play much and he never gets the ball on offense, but 2 rebounds in 15 min?? Thats just not good enough.We are going to need AO playing big minutes in the BE. He also never gets fed the ball, even when he is posting hard. I love what TO has done so far but am not 100 % sold on his ability to bang vs teams like Pitt.
One of the factors is that Roscoe is barely playing the 3 at all. DD has played >35 minutes the past 2 games.
I don't get why you say Roscoe can't play the 3, of course he can. He may not be the best shooter I agree, but they can put him in at the 3 and he can guard almost any other teams 3. I think if anything Daniels will have a hard time playing the 3 (on D) cause he lacks the lateral quickness (I know Dickey is a guard but he was going by him at will) - I think Roscoe will be big this season at the 3 because of his D. Roscoe may not be as good a shooter as Daniels but he is a much better defender then Daniels.Roscoe cant play the 3 tho and thats becoming an issue as it really jams things up at the 4 and 5 and leaves only DD really at the 3. Daniels has to do more than 3 pts in 35 min tho. 2 subpar games from him in a row. I realize Oriakhi didnt play much and he never gets the ball on offense, but 2 rebounds in 15 min?? Thats just not good enough.
Roscoe can defend the 3, but when he plays there he is out of place and it kills us offensively. Maybe he just had a bad couple of games, but is it a coincidence that hes had 2 great games back to back and he played the 4 the whole time? He doenst move well enough without the ball and he isnt a strong dribbler, driver etc. Hes just far more effective playing the 4, which is unfortunate because that leaves DD as our only strong option at 3 and Roscoe, TO, and AO fighting for time at the 4.I don't get why you say Roscoe can't play the 3, of course he can. He may not be the best shooter I agree, but they can put him in at the 3 and he can guard almost any other teams 3. I think if anything Daniels will have a hard time playing the 3 (on D) cause he lacks the lateral quickness (I know Dickey is a guard but he was going by him at will) - I think Roscoe will be big this season at the 3 because of his D. Roscoe may not be as good a shooter as Daniels but he is a much better defender then Daniels.
I agree that he's not the best offensive player and that you lose the person that can hit the open 3 in Daniels - but that's all you lose is a shooter cause Daniels has shown no ability whatsover to create his own shot. As the season progresses I see this team running the floor more which Roscoe is better at then Daniels and I also expect more point production from the bigs as the season goes on. The way I look at it is when we play better teams I'd rather lose a little offense then lose a lot on Defense - Roscoe's gonna be able to guard the 3's from just about any other team in the nation whereas Daniels will be such a big liability on D he is either gonna cause our bigs to get in foul trouble (by his man penetrating past him and the bigs having to help) or the guards are gonna have to come over to help which will lead to a lot of open 3's for the opposing team. To be honest, once the Big East begins I'd rather see Roscoe starting at the 3 - Daniels is just too much of a liability on Defense (he can't guard a chair). Defense wins games and has been a key to UConns success over the yrs, look at last year, we won cause of our D-ya Kemba and Lamb could hit 3's (which is what Lamb and Napier can do) but we didn't have or need a spot shooter to win (which is what Daniels is). I'm not saying Daniels won't be productive on offense-he will definitely hit open 3's throughout the season, I'd just rather see him come off the bench at the 3.Roscoe can defend the 3, but when he plays there he is out of place and it kills us offensively. Maybe he just had a bad couple of games, but is it a coincidence that hes had 2 great games back to back and he played the 4 the whole time? He doenst move well enough without the ball and he isnt a strong dribbler, driver etc. Hes just far more effective playing the 4, which is unfortunate because that leaves DD as our only strong option at 3 and Roscoe, TO, and AO fighting for time at the 4.
I agree Mark. I guess its not so much that Roscoe cant play the 3, but a matter of his effectivness. All of his strenghts (defense, rebounding, hustle, energy, scrappiness, putback buckets); those are all suitable for a 4. Daniels is a good defender and rebounder as well, and I disagree that he cant create his own shot. He may not be great at it yet, but he has shown an ability to do so. And Daniels is not a terrible defender at all. In our offense we need a 3 to be versatile and have an ability to shoot, drive, and dish, and Rosoce just cant do that. Im not arguing that Daniels has been phenominal, but his game is far better equipped to play the 3 in our offense than Roscoes.I agree that he's not the best offensive player and that you lose the person that can hit the open 3 in Daniels - but that's all you lose is a shooter cause Daniels has shown no ability whatsover to create his own shot. As the season progresses I see this team running the floor more which Roscoe is better at then Daniels and I also expect more point production from the bigs as the season goes on. The way I look at it is when we play better teams I'd rather lose a little offense then lose a lot on Defense - Roscoe's gonna be able to guard the 3's from just about any other team in the nation whereas Daniels will be such a big liability on D he is either gonna cause our bigs to get in foul trouble (by his man penetrating past him and the bigs having to help) or the guards are gonna have to come over to help which will lead to a lot of open 3's for the opposing team. To be honest, once the Big East begins I'd rather see Roscoe starting at the 3 - Daniels is just too much of a liability on Defense (he can't guard a chair). Defense wins games and has been a key to UConns success over the yrs, look at last year, we won cause of our D-ya Kemba and Lamb could hit 3's (which is what Lamb and Napier can do) but we didn't have or need a spot shooter to win (which is what Daniels is). I'm not saying Daniels won't be productive on offense-he will definitely hit open 3's throughout the season, I'd just rather see him come off the bench at the 3.
I agree Mark. I guess its not so much that Roscoe cant play the 3, but a matter of his effectivness. All of his strenghts (defense, rebounding, hustle, energy, scrappiness, putback buckets); those are all suitable for a 4. Daniels is a good defender and rebounder as well, and I disagree that he cant create his own shot. He may not be great at it yet, but he has shown an ability to do so. And Daniels is not a terrible defender at all. In our offense we need a 3 to be versatile and have an ability to shoot, drive, and dish, and Rosoce just cant do that. Im not arguing that Daniels has been phenominal, but his game is far better equipped to play the 3 in our offense than Roscoes.
SN-33 minutes, RB 7 minutes
JL-33 minutes, RB 7 minutes
DD-25 minutes, Scoe 10 minutes, Giff 5 minutes
TO-20 minutes, AO 12 minutes, Scoe 8 minutes
AD-27 minutes, AO 13 minutes
I'm not sure what everybody is looking at but DD is averaging 28MPG, and in the last two has played 34 and 36.
Guys. He's our 3, and if he's getting 35MPG range during the early going, it seems likely that he'll be getting that later on.
The reason AO isn't getting minutes is because RS is taking his minutes, and as a poster above indicated, RS is simply not a 3. He brings a lot to the table, but the fact that DD got 34 minutes last night and AO got 18 and RS got 31 is because the fight between RS and AO is over the 4 spot. 18 and 31 is 49. That's 40 minutes at the 4, and then 6 more when DD was on the bench, leaving 3 minutes somewhere else.
It's clear at this point, and subject to change, that AO and RS are going to be fighting for minutes all year.
DD is a much better offensive weapon than either guy, he's learning to play D and seems quite committed to it, he's a decent shot blocker and rebounder, he shoots the 3 well, and he runs the floor constantly. Hard to keep him on the bench.