Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CocoHusky, post: 4008788, member: 5823"] I read this clause slightly differently. Nike endorsement with UCONN covers team related activities- essentially games, practice, game related travel etc. Even under the prior rules, away from team activities Paige could have certainly rocked a pair of Adidas if she wanted to. Azzi for example is not going to throw away all her Under Armour gear. Neither Azzi nor Paige will be allowed at Steph Curry camp unless they lace up in Under Armour. My interpretation is that away from team activities they would be free to endorse other than Nike. BTW for a student to prevail against the school or NCAA based on state NIL legislation is not meaningful. Any state could tomorrow decide to make NCAA players employees of the state and start paying them and the NCAA would just turn around and make those players ineligible. State NIL legislation efforts were entirely a big nothing burger. [/QUOTE]