Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CocoHusky, post: 2136473, member: 5823"] Retroactive was the most disturbing aspect that added to the controversy. The call was the correct one by rule. If the call were made in real time it would have been 2 shots for UCONN and possession of the ball. Because the call was made retroactively, MSU got a possession that could have extended the MSU lead. UCONN got a stop and possession which allowed for the stoppage and video review. The review resulted in two shots for UCONN. UCONN retained the possession earned on the stop. Those that are thinking that the refs were trying to help UCONN are nuts, because as Geno said if you are trying to help UCONN you make that call when it happened because it was right in front of the ref on the baseline. What happens if MSU had scored on that possession? [/QUOTE]