Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="the Q, post: 3625742, member: 8020"] Most talent was 05-06 Best opportunity was probably 08-09. That Michigan st team had one legit nba player and he came off the bench as a true frosh. The front court should’ve thrown them around like children. But much like 05-06 it relies too much on one PG. in this case it was price’s outside shooting. He was going to have to go full Shabazz to win it all (no off games) because that team could not stretch the floor. And Austrie was just completely overwhelmed. 95-96 is a brutal one. Too. Something named Daryl Wilson shot the lights out, while doron and ray did not. That just happens in a one game format. I’m tempted to go them just for that, but beating that Kentucky team would’ve been brutal. The thing about 09 and 96 are the teams in the title game would’ve been excellent teams. 2006 flordia turned out to be really good too. Even the 94 team would’ve had to go through arkansas. Not like the best teams on this list missed chances in weak years for the title. The two teams that lost to eventual champs (95 and 2002) were right there with both. 2006 makes me sick just thinking of losing to a bunch of absolute nobodies. Especially the future first rounders in the front court getting thrown around. I’ll say 96 due to the fluke shooting and Moore. 09 just had zero depth to begin with. [/QUOTE]