Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Football
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
What was the ACC thinking?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="champs99and04, post: 2337565, member: 488"] Props to you for doing this research. So the numbers look like this: ACC - 232 total, 16.6 per team PAC-12 - 243 total, 20.2 per team Big Ten - 253 total, 18.1 per team Overall, they're about what I expected - the ACC is slightly behind the other power conferences, with the gap being manageable but not entirely insignificant. I'm not under the illusion that the league isn't competitive. It's a power conference for a reason and at first glance the hierarchy seems to align with the norm. Swap teams like Virginia Tech, Georgia Tech, UNC, and Louisville for whatever middle class exists for other conferences and I don't think much changes in the grand scheme. The difference between the ACC and other conferences still lies, though, in the power structure. At first glance it isn't particularly noteworthy - the difference between the upper class of the ACC and Big Ten/PAC 12 is about proportional to the overall numbers. What's different is the geography. The talent is distributed from south to north in a way that is almost entirely chronological, with the private schools predictably bringing up the rear. When Clemson, Florida State, and Miami are on, that's fine. But I don't know that they can cycle through reigns of dominance like the other conferences can and I'm not sure they can survive Florida State going in the tank the way the Big Ten navigated Michigan's struggles or the PAC-12 persisted through USC's slump. They have programs like Washington, Cal, Oregon, Michigan State, Wisconsin, and Nebraska waiting in the wings to re-claim the torch in the event that the traditional powers stumble. That's the reason the ACC was on life support when they added - to get back to the point of the thread - Louisville. They are geographically in no man's land when compared to the other power conferences in the same way the Big East used to be. That might not matter if the Big 12 dissolves and they can poach them and add Notre Dame, but for now they're still a weird hybrid conference that doesn't really make any sense at all and has been able to hide behind a couple programs. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forum statistics
Threads
164,717
Messages
4,407,680
Members
10,225
Latest member
Tempo101
.
..
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
What was the ACC thinking?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom