I say maybe 5-7...don't forget the OL provided protection all year so the chances of him getting hurt at some point were still pretty good.I would imagine better than 3-9 and we probably don't burn DW redshirt.
Thoughts?
If he never got hurt or if he stayed in the lineup? Remember, this team was 3-4 and coming off maybe its best offensive game in 4 years against Cincy before some things went south and then we gave up. If the injured BS never was taken out, we beat Tulane and maybe get one more because I don't think this team quits the way it did. If BS was actually healthy the whole year, every chance to think we get to 6-6.
I'd still love to know what happened with the lineup change. Did HCBD actually believe switching QBs gave us a better chance to win? (If that is the answer he is a total idiot and shouldn't be allowed to coach video football.). Did he know DW was a step backwards, but knew BS wasn't coming back and was giving up on this season to prepare for next season? (In which case at 3-6 it was incredibly boneheaded but one game later, with bowl eligibility gone, I can at least understand the theory.). Or did HCBD or BS just decide before Temple that BS was just too hurt to keep going and he needed to be taken out? (It doesn't sound like this came from BS, but if it did obviously HCBD's hands were tied. If it came from HCBD and BS wanted to play, it's very odd but I can understand a coach being protective I guess.)
The point is, we still don't really know what happened.
There is no way DW looked that much different in practice that this change makes sense.
Yeah...I dont think it was an injury situation. Didn't they say they were going to put DW in earlier but he got hurt in practice so they sent BS out again? Everything I read made it sound like DW was eventually put in because BD thought he gave them a better chance to win...not that BS was injured.
Which...after seeing how much DW wasn't ready...is shocking. If it was an injury..GA needed to go in. There is no way DW looked that much different in practice that this change makes sense.
Reason # 4802 that there needs to be a HC change...but it doesn't appear that will happen.
Since we don't believe (with reason) what HCBD says, I don't give any weight to what he said about this. If the reason, however, was that HCBD actually believed that playing DW gave us a better chance to win, it explains why the team quit from the moment the decision was made. They all had to know it was nuts to think that was going to make us better.
But it doesn't explain how, after the decision failed so miserably, he kept putting Williams back out there and didn't make a change back.
I still think there is much more going on here than we know. But that's just a hunch.
Absolutely agree with Bizlaw in both posts... great points... The last 5 games the team as a team{excluding several individuals} did not show up exacerbated by the on-field game timeIf he never got hurt or if he stayed in the lineup? Remember, this team was 3-4 and coming off maybe its best offensive game in 4 years against Cincy before some things went south and then we gave up. If the injured BS never was taken out, we beat Tulane and maybe get one more because I don't think this team quits the way it did. If BS was actually healthy the whole year, every chance to think we get to 6-6.
I'd still love to know what happened with the lineup change. Did HCBD actually believe switching QBs gave us a better chance to win? (If that is the answer he is a total idiot and shouldn't be allowed to coach video football.). Did he know DW was a step backwards, but knew BS wasn't coming back and was giving up on this season to prepare for next season? (In which case at 3-6 it was incredibly boneheaded but one game later, with bowl eligibility gone, I can at least understand the theory.). Or did HCBD or BS just decide before Temple that BS was just too hurt to keep going and he needed to be taken out? (It doesn't sound like this came from BS, but if it did obviously HCBD's hands were tied. If it came from HCBD and BS wanted to play, it's very odd but I can understand a coach being protective I guess.)
The point is, we still don't really know what happened.
When did BS turn into Brady our record would still be 3-9 if he started every game, I don't think you guys were watching the same qb i was who was missing throws and constantly under pressure.
I still think there is much more going on here than we know. But that's just a hunch.
You think DW was out the door if he didn't play, maybe? Or BS was like, eh I'm done, I got a kid, f this. Or something else? C'mon, Biz, let's speculate wildly, what else do we have going on?
Since we don't believe (with reason) what HCBD says, I don't give any weight to what he said about this. If the reason, however, was that HCBD actually believed that playing DW gave us a better chance to win, it explains why the team quit from the moment the decision was made. They all had to know it was nuts to think that was going to make us better.
But it doesn't explain how, after the decision failed so miserably, he kept putting Williams back out there and didn't make a change back.
I still think there is much more going on here than we know. But that's just a hunch.
The kind version is that BS finally couldn't answer the bell, bowl eligibility was lost and the team packed it in.
The no so kind version is that BD pulled a PP panic move at QB (due to injury or not) and went with a guy the team hadn't bought into. Maybe they preferred Anderson or even Davis and packed it in. Watching reactions when DW sailed passes into the bench would support this theory.
Not a fan of wildly speculating about personal (as opposed to personnel) matters. But it's really, really hard to believe that HCBD thought DW increased our chances of winning, and that if he thought that he didn't go back to BS halfway through the BC game. I don't think he's capable of being a good head coach but I'm having trouble believing anyone could be that delusional.