I don’t know that to be true, but I do know it to be irrelevant. By being tier 1 content the BTN was bought by every cable subscriber in the NYC DMA regardless of viewership and at a premium rate. (That includes Fairfield County by the way.) Because of that, Rutgers was the right choice for the Big Ten financially.
Everyone who talks about how Rutgers hasn’t performed on the field in on the court and how they are not a favorite of other fans, both accurate by the way, is missing the actual dynamics that motivated the offer.
Ironically in an article linked in another post, I read that Rutgers is in worse financial difficulties now then when they joined the big 10. With their deficit being as high as $70 million in a single year.
To be 100% fair, Rutgers is looking better in sports since joining the B1G. Last season, men's basketball was relevant for the first time in a long time. Greg has football moving in the right direction although there may very well be a ceiling. I'm not sure WBB factors in to "what matters", but in all likelihood Rutgers will remain competitive but non-contending for the remainder of the CVS era. NCAA's, potentially. Deep runs, unlikely. Conference championships, doubtful.
But Rutgers Wrestling is "something", Women's Soccer has history, I have noticed some individual track references and things looking up in Field Hockey (or was it Women's LAX?), bit being around RU anymore I can't and don't try to keep up, but I think, on average, joining the B1G has been a good thing for most sports.
And as someone mentioned somewhere, I know RU is financially awful. Greg's return to football has increased interest, and if men's basketball continues to have even modest success - that would be great.