Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Get a Job, post: 3369648, member: 9775"] Well it's always better for taxpayers for others to have jobs, assuming it means they will require less public assistance. To clarify, I am not coming at this from a nanny-state point of view. I am not arguing the rich should pay for the poor out of principle. I am simply wondering what happens if and when there is literally not enough money being made available by employers for human labor. At that point society can either let the lower class fester, or take money from the producers and distribute it. Imagine the limiting case in which there are literally no human jobs available in manufacturing, transportation, and logistics. I'm genuinely interested to hear alternative ideas for dealing with such a situation. [/QUOTE]