Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="southie, post: 4226537, member: 2527"] That's why I know it's tough on the committee as not all Q1 wins are created equal. Maryland is actually [B]5-8 [/B]in NET Q1 wins/losses (3-8 in RPI Q1 wins); NET ranking = 13; RPI ranking = 10 Iowa State is [B]4-5 [/B]in Q1 wins/losses; NET ranking = 11; RPI ranking = 7 Some teams below them as of the recent reveal: Oklahoma is [B]8-5[/B] Q1 in wins/losses (with 2 wins over Baylor); NET ranking = 34; RPI ranking = 12 Not among the Top 16 recent reveal: Oregon is [B]8-8[/B] in Q1 wins/losses; NET ranking = 12; RPI ranking = 17 Georgia is [B]7-6[/B] in Q1 wins/losses; NET ranking = 27; RPI ranking = 28 Notre Dame is [B]6-7[/B] in Q1 win/losses; NET ranking = 20; RPI ranking = 19 So, I must be missing something as I thought there was supposed to an emphasis on Q1 wins. Maybe the committee penalizes a team more for a bad loss than they do for a Q1 win. Or, perhaps they still value RPI rankings more than anything else . . . [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.warrennolan.com/basketballw/2022/net-nitty[/URL] [/QUOTE]