Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="HooperScooper, post: 4180511, member: 10"] I'm not sure what you are arguing about. The fact that Flanigan has only played in 9 of Auburn's 21 games and is averaging less than 7 ppg means Auburn is pretty good without him. They haven't missed him. Would they be better if they had him for a full season completely healthy? Sure, I'd bet on that. But they're 20-1 and ranked #1 without that Flanigan. But if you're going to argue this point about Auburn then ask yourself where would UConn be if they were completely healthy all season? What if everyone played every game? Would they have only 2 losses? 1 loss? So it goes both ways here. [/QUOTE]