Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Title, post: 2614959, member: 7786"] That's just absurd. In the five years of each conference's existence, the league's finished (obviously not done this year, but the BE advantage will just be more in at the end with two 1 seeds)... 2014: Big East 5th (4 bids) - AAC 7th (4 bids) 2015: Big East 2nd (6 bids) - AAC 9th (2 bids) 2016: Big East 3rd (5 bids) - AAC 7th (4 bids) 2017: Big East 3rd (7 bids) - AAC 7th (2 bids) 2018: Big East 3rd (6 projected) - AAC 7th (3 projected) After this year, the Big East will AVERAGE 56% of its league in the Tournament per year. If you look at the numbers, the AAC is LITERALLY closer to the MVC than the Big East. And as far as 'gaining' the only year it was even remotely close was the first year of each league. There's a Grand Canyon gap between a Top 3 league annually and the top non major. It's embarrassing to even juxtapose, there's just nothing to hang your hat on. [URL="https://kenpom.com/conf.php?c=Amer&y=2018"]kenpom.com subscription[/URL] [/QUOTE]