Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="upstater, post: 2005776, member: 153"] Wowowowowow. Stop it, you're embarrassing yourself. You can't read. The 3/13 date was about your WRONG claims about Tulsa. Holy cow, it even references Tulsa right next to the date. You are so mixed up you don't know if you are coming or going. I'll say it again: when referencing RPI, the first thing I wrote is that there are a great deal of divergences between the many services. It is the first thing I wrote. VERY FIRST. And I even mentioned Pomeroy. So for you to say I am moving the goalposts when it was the FIRST thing I wrote is totally dishonesty. Secondly, you were absolutely wrong about Tulsa. They got in with an RPI in the 60s. This is why I gave you the link with a 3/13 date, to show you Tulsa had an RPI in the 60s, but you are so dishonest you won't even admit you were wrong. [/QUOTE]