- Joined
- May 2, 2014
- Messages
- 522
- Reaction Score
- 1,630
So says the Economist magazine. Sound familiar???
Like Steve Spurrier told his team when he coached at Florida: "Boys, let's go out there and beat 'em as bad as we can beat 'em. If they don't like it, tell 'em to get better." The billionaire NBA owners like Steve Ballmer and Mark Cuban should just ante up. Forget the salary cap - just break the bank and make it a super-team arms race. The teams who can't afford it will at least benefit from the luxury tax.Obviously a tongue-in-cheek remark as related to UConn's domination in WCBB. However, the same principle applies here.
UConn raised the bar. It was up to the other college teams to raise their level of play. Mississippi State did that this year. We got better, improved ourselves and did beat the Huskies.
Same thing applies in the NBA. It is up to other teams to improve so they can beat the Warriors. It is not GS's fault that they have built a winning team. It is smart management in the front office (drafting great players & signing veterans) along with great coaching that has lead them to three straight finals and 2 championships.
Anybody whining about either just does not get it. Each team is responsible for themselves.
The NBA is bad for basketball..... no traveling calls, defensive 3 seconds, bogus fouls etc. It is hard to take seriously .
So says the Economist magazine. Sound familiar???
you joking right.... and the Lakers is my team!BTW the 1980's "Showtime" Lakers were bigger assemblage of super-talent than the Warriors. IMO Magic, Kareem, James Worthy, Michael Cooper, Byron Scott, etc., would totally kick Golden State's ass.
you joking right.... and the Lakers is my team!
I believe Mrs Curry was trying to say that in her own words last year.The NBA is bad for basketball..... no traveling calls, defensive 3 seconds, bogus fouls etc. It is hard to take seriously .
Was watching 30 for 30 last night and just to show how much the game has changed when Kevin McHale clothes lined Curt Rambis in game 2 of the 1984 Finals it changed the entire series and McHale was not even ejected from the game.The game is completely different than when Magic and company played. The rules make it much easier to score now. The Lakers would easily light up the score board. And Magic would average 20 assists.
Same thing applies in the NBA. It is up to other teams to improve so they can beat the Warriors. It is not GS's fault that they have built a winning team. It is smart management in the front office (drafting great players & signing veterans) along with great coaching that has lead them to three straight finals and 2 championships.
Honestly it depends on what rules this fantasy match up would take place. Under the rules the Lakers played under: More frequent lane violations called, traveling calls, and much more physical play with no such thing as a "flagrant" foul, the Showtime Lakers would crush this little team. Under the current rules which includes the former and an emphasis on 3 point shots, this current Warriors team would win in 6.you joking right.... and the Lakers is my team!
Yeah you're right. Easier said than done. Frankly it's different in the pros where you can just buy a winning culture (just ask the old Yankees) and WCBB where you have to first install a winning culture by way of coaching, sturcture and expectations and the talent then flocks to you. A much slower route. Different concept and over time, a longer lasting result.What was the Warriors big offseason move last year? Signing Kevin Durant. Not exactly an out-of-the-box genius move. Just about every team in the league wanted him but he was getting the same max deal from any non-OKC team so he went to the team that was already the most talent-laden.
It really is the same thing as UConn. People say that it's up to the other teams to improve to beat UConn. But that's far easier said than done given that UConn consistently brings in more #1 recruits than anyone else.
It's not UConn's fault and it's not GSW's fault. Both are well run. But saying "it is up to other teams to improve" is almost insultingly facile.
Not joking - those Lakers were a much more athletic collection of HOF-ers, and would annihilate today's Warriors under old rules, today's rules, or any rules.you joking right.... and the Lakers is my team!
He needs another 5 championships under his belt before wrestling that title away from Scottie Pippen.Yes, and Durant is the greatest role player ever!
What you said...all of the above. But the lack of any traveling calls is what makes it a joke and near impossible to take seriously. Naismith is turning in his grave...why even bother to make anyone dribble?The NBA is bad for basketball..... no traveling calls, defensive 3 seconds, bogus fouls etc. It is hard to take seriously .
Majic and Larry saved the NBA.What you said...all of the above. But the lack of any traveling calls is what makes it a joke and near impossible to take seriously. Naismith is turning in his grave...why even bother to make anyone dribble?
If I could pinpoint the origins of this 'no-call' violation trend, I'd look towards Magic Johnson.
Same with me, except they never got me back.Lakers were my team too, until Kobe arrived. I took a 20-year Laker vacation 'cuz I can't stand him.
Yup. I've always said about the NBA: If you took away the traveling and the palming you wouldn't have a game.What you said...all of the above. But the lack of any traveling calls is what makes it a joke and near impossible to take seriously. Naismith is turning in his grave...why even bother to make anyone dribble?