Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="JustbrewitMan, post: 5201049, member: 7806"]
Also, here's the KP defensive ratings for last year's WAC opponents. I did a quick boxscore check of their pre-conference schedule and some comments on game performance. Don't have time to do another deep dive.

Gonzaga – 51, SF – 37, SC – 134, L-M – 266, Pepperidge Farms – 269, SD – 204, Portland – 347, Pacific – 359

Early season: Hawaii – 154, New Mexico – 23, Weber St – 207, SDSU (got smoked in this game BTW, held to 8pts) – 11*, Xavier – 45 (rough game), Davidson – 86, Utah – 47, Boise St – 29, Cleveland St – 231, Colorado St – 49 (rough game), UNLV – 97 (rough game), MTSU (rough game) - 297, N KY – 163 (mid game), Missouri St – 110 (good game), Kent St. – 193 (2pts, rough game),

WAC conference (very good game/mid game vs. SF, good games 2x vs. Zags)

It's pretty clear he was hit-and-miss vs. better defenses, but did bring it more often than not vs. the better WAC foes.

Some of the signs were there for what we've seen. But I don't fault our staff for the decision as I KNOW they did a very deep dive on him during the process.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach