Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Towney007, post: 2897972, member: 5832"] This is circular at this point. 1.) It has no history. If people don't care about it your history, it's pretty well meaningless as a thing to be used for marketing purposes and to sell the program. Do you honestly think an 18 year old kid gives two craps that UConn we co-champs in the Yankee Conference in DII 18,000 years ago? Honestly. Do you think the tipping point for Texas in deciding whether to let us into the Big XII is our history of beating Maine? Do you really think anyone not on the football team at the time or just completely past drunk on all things UConn care? They don't. So they don't have a history that's useful. Yes, they existed, congrats to them, they're still breathing. 2.) I'm going to spell it out because this is really, really hard for you, I get it. -Randy Edsall has done a bad job. -Performance incentives are for doing a good job. -The team is doing really poorly, worse, in-fact - than nearly every single team in Division-1 football right now -Why are you ok with a coach getting $28,000 in performance incentives for this? You clearly want P5 treatment but don't carry P5 standards. 3.) Hope floats, I guess. You're just going to be disappointed. The only P5 conference on the table at all anymore is the Big East. Maybe. [/QUOTE]