USF -17' @ UConn | The Boneyard

USF -17' @ UConn

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,364
Reaction Score
68,239
Yikes.

Opened at 17 and moved to 17.5.
 

UConnNick

from Vince Lombardi's home town
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Messages
5,074
Reaction Score
14,064
I'd be inclined to take the points. If Stony Brook could stay within two TDs, we ought to be able to at home.
 
Joined
Oct 3, 2016
Messages
481
Reaction Score
681
USF appears to be overrated based on the Stony Brook game. I would not bet either way on this game. Too early in the season to figure out these teams.
 
Joined
Oct 7, 2016
Messages
209
Reaction Score
506
Believe it or not, I actually saw the line as high as -21.5 for USF earlier.
 
Joined
Sep 1, 2011
Messages
4,915
Reaction Score
5,364
Def taking USF -17. Flowers is going to feast on our defense.
Not trying to raise false hopes, but isn't the 3-5 designed to contain guys like Flowers? We do get Diggs back but still are without Levenberry, and Junior. I'm still not sold on USF's ranking either. Good thing Fatukasi can play, we'd be screwed without him.
 

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,364
Reaction Score
68,239
Total opened at 62/64 depending where and steamed to 68 in case anyone was wondering what the market thinks of the defenses in this game.
 

Purple Stein

I like to sim things.
Joined
Jul 9, 2017
Messages
1,984
Reaction Score
8,339
Total opened at 62/64 depending where and steamed to 68 in case anyone was wondering what the market thinks of the defenses in this game.

Taking the under on that. It takes two to tango if you're talking 68 points...
 
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
668
Reaction Score
836
Not trying to raise false hopes, but isn't the 3-5 designed to contain guys like Flowers? We do get Diggs back but still are without Levenberry, and Junior. I'm still not sold on USF's ranking either. Good thing Fatukasi can play, we'd be screwed without him.

Our defense could not contain a mediocre FCS team. The only thing that saved UConn was HC coaches took the "metal off the offensive pedal" in the second half

Sherriffs doesn't pose a threat to USF, and Dave P was, due to inexperience, flustered by FCS game speed. And now he will have to face a very quick and talented USF team.

I don't see UConn scoring very much, no matter who is at QB.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,401
Reaction Score
18,886
Our defense could not contain a mediocre FCS team. The only thing that saved UConn was HC coaches took the "metal off the offensive pedal" in the second half

Sherriffs doesn't pose a threat to USF, and Dave P was, due to inexperience, flustered by FCS game speed. And now he will have to face a very quick and talented USF team.

I don't see UConn scoring very much, no matter who is at QB.

Yes HC was scoreless in the 2nd half because they took their foot off the gas. :rolleyes:
 
Joined
Oct 7, 2016
Messages
209
Reaction Score
506
Our defense could not contain a mediocre FCS team. The only thing that saved UConn was HC coaches took the "metal off the offensive pedal" in the second half

Sherriffs doesn't pose a threat to USF, and Dave P was, due to inexperience, flustered by FCS game speed. And now he will have to face a very quick and talented USF team.

I don't see UConn scoring very much, no matter who is at QB.

To be frank, we did put up 27 points against them last year in Tampa. Anything is certainly possible here.
 
Joined
Sep 1, 2011
Messages
4,915
Reaction Score
5,364
Our defense could not contain a mediocre FCS team.
We didn't have our four best defensive players on the field for most or all of this game... Fatukasi, Diggs, Levenberry and Junior. We will have at least two them back this Saturday.
 
Joined
Apr 29, 2017
Messages
313
Reaction Score
344
USF has looked terrible so far. They will NOT cover and there's high probability the will LOSE!
 

Online statistics

Members online
419
Guests online
1,988
Total visitors
2,407

Forum statistics

Threads
159,634
Messages
4,198,422
Members
10,065
Latest member
Rjja


.
Top Bottom