Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Rufus, post: 4391217, member: 7277"] The B1G wouldn’t lower itself to sending a letter to the regents about the positives of moving to the B1G, but just off the top of my head: [LIST] [*]Increased revenue [*]Increased nationwide exposure of the UCLA brand [*]Membership in the B1G Academic Alliance [*]Saving the Olympic sports that would have otherwise been eliminated [*]Increased access to the CFP with a stronger conference schedule resulting in an increased likelihood of getting an at-large bid [/LIST] One other point on the revenue. The SEC and B1G are likely to split half of the CFP revenue between themselves with the next contract per past reports. UCLA will receive more CFP revenue as a member of the B1G than it would remaining in the PAC. It’s also silly that one of the PAC’s five reasons to oppose the move is carbon neutrality. 20% of their case against the move is the carbon output of additional plane rides. That’s stretching to say the least. [/QUOTE]