Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="hoophuskee, post: 4995544, member: 3535"] This stuff about performance not measured in a vacuum is code for blindly listening to others. It defies common sense. Some players ranked 6th or 8th will be best suited for being role players – not All-Americans as an example. That doesn’t make them a bust. Just because there is faulty analysis from an Evaluator doesn't make a player is a bust. The root Cause of the problem is that the Evaluator in some cases is just flat out wrong. And in regard to the Fan that defines what a bust is - is using the faulty analysis put forth by the Evaluator. To not even be able to question it—is just mind-boggling. I’ll say again “HIGH SCHOOL EVALUATORS.” That's why the player is not a bust. You put faulty information into a computer it will spike out wrong data. Same with the H/S Evaluations. And I want to thank you. For suggesting UCONN had FIVE BUSTS while getting to the Finals. IMO is so outrageous - I'm putting an IG here. You are literally making up excuses that ignores performance all because of what a H/S evaluator says is beyond comprehensible. It's okay that we think for ourselves instead of being led on leash without our own observations in which in some cases we might know more about the game or the player than the Evaluator. This isn't a court of law to define who is a bust. We can use logic. Five “busts” on a team that got to the Finals; Just wow. [/QUOTE]