CamrnCrz1974
Good Guy for a Dookie
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 2,047
- Reaction Score
- 11,954
Taking it one step further, if UCONN wins on Friday, then Massey has the following matchup spread:Based on those percentages, the odds would be as follows:
UConn 6/5
Stanford 12/5
South Carolina 9/2
Arizona 13/1
Of course, that would be a book without any vigorish so a more realistic future book (adding 20% juice) would be:
UConn 4/5
Stanford 8/5
South Carolina 4/1
Arizona 12/1
Also...
UConn -13 1/2
Arizona +13 1/2
Stanford -3
South Carolina +3
I beg to differ slightly with you. These types of calculations seem to me to conflate odds and ultimate winners although, as you point out, outlier permutations do exist.Which doesnt mean it favors UConn over Stanford, merely that UConn is a much bigger favorite in its semifinal game than Stanford is in its.
Eg, while many permutations are possible, here's one that would generate those results:
UConn over Ariz 85%
Stan over SC 58%
----------------
UConn over SC 55%
Stan over UConn 51%
Stan over Ariz 60%
SC over Ariz 51%
Sneaky ESPN. Two biased ESPN analysts favored Baylor to win the Elite 8 match up, and now they favor Stanford to win the NC while appearing to mislead as if Uconn has a better chance of winning the NC.Which doesnt mean it favors UConn over Stanford, merely that UConn is a much bigger favorite in its semifinal game than Stanford is in its.
Eg, while many permutations are possible, here's one that would generate those results:
UConn over Ariz 85%
Stan over SC 58%
----------------
UConn over SC 55%
Stan over UConn 51%
Stan over Ariz 60%
SC over Ariz 51%
"Two biased analysts" AKA, "People paid to give their opinion, giving an opinion."Sneaky ESPN. Two biased ESPN analysts favored Baylor to win the Elite 8 match up, and now they favor Stanford to win the NC while appearing to mislead as if Uconn has a better chance of winning the NC.