- Joined
- Nov 3, 2022
- Messages
- 35
- Reaction Score
- 219
If the NCAA wants to continue to "champion" players as students as well as athletes, is there any credence to moving the start of the season up a week or two or even three? This also could be completely impossible and does not address the underlying issue of mass transferring, but is it worth a thought?
I understand that in certain places there could be legitimately dangerous heat to play in, although a solution to this could be similar to what UConn's baseball team does in the early part of the season, playing in more friendly climates in March. If they were to make Week 0 (or a hypothetical Week -1) more of the standard start date for the sport, it would at least partially assist some of the timing issues of the end of the fall semester not lining up well with the CFB season.
In a way this is robbing Peter to pay Paul as you are stealing Summer practice time, but considering the legal and scholastic ramifications modifying the portal, transferring, etc, this could be the one lever that the NCAA could unilaterally pull in order to help somewhat.
I understand that in certain places there could be legitimately dangerous heat to play in, although a solution to this could be similar to what UConn's baseball team does in the early part of the season, playing in more friendly climates in March. If they were to make Week 0 (or a hypothetical Week -1) more of the standard start date for the sport, it would at least partially assist some of the timing issues of the end of the fall semester not lining up well with the CFB season.
In a way this is robbing Peter to pay Paul as you are stealing Summer practice time, but considering the legal and scholastic ramifications modifying the portal, transferring, etc, this could be the one lever that the NCAA could unilaterally pull in order to help somewhat.