Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="DefenseBB, post: 2204577, member: 7492"]
This is an instance of a University not treating all of its women's administrators and coaches in the same consistent pattern/manner as the men. From my reading of numerous articles and the public court proceeding, Meyer had an undisclosed relationship with a coach, for a period of a few years. Allegations of misconduct against the coach and then the dismal by the AD of the coach and ultimate resignation of Meyer vs. being fired. The coach deserved to be let go, however the administrator should have been given a slight reprimand and be allowed to keep her job.  University was not consistent in how it treated similar instances in the men's department. The judgement is NOT a drop in the bucket and the myth that P5 schools have oogles of cash needs to stop, they don't. 
IMO if every university would treat the men's indiscretions the same as the women's this judgement would not have happened. The "old boy" network of too much tolerance (minimizing the sanctions or simply ignoring) continues to ultimately hurt programs. There is a similar suit going on at Texas. My guess is that coach will also win.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach