- Joined
- Jan 5, 2016
- Messages
- 5,306
- Reaction Score
- 28,416
Ninety percent of women's [basketball] teams were coached by women in 1971. That has since dropped to 43 percent.
Tara VanDerveer talks gender bias and new Women's Sports Foundation report
The title of my thread may be misleading, since the article also says that there are fewer female ADs (but how many fewer? no numbers, just impressions); if that is, in fact, true about fewer female ADs, then maybe men just hire men. But has Title IX with its effect of enlarging women's athletics actually made it more desirable (that is: profitable) to coach women's athletics? And if that is the case, why are men grabbing these positions?
Of course, if we focus solely on the very, very most elite WCBB teams currently (ND, SC, Baylor and UConn), only one has a male head coach, and he has an extremely active and essential female ass't coaching staff. So, it's not like men are proven better coaches or program builders.
So why is this happening?
Tara VanDerveer talks gender bias and new Women's Sports Foundation report
The title of my thread may be misleading, since the article also says that there are fewer female ADs (but how many fewer? no numbers, just impressions); if that is, in fact, true about fewer female ADs, then maybe men just hire men. But has Title IX with its effect of enlarging women's athletics actually made it more desirable (that is: profitable) to coach women's athletics? And if that is the case, why are men grabbing these positions?
Of course, if we focus solely on the very, very most elite WCBB teams currently (ND, SC, Baylor and UConn), only one has a male head coach, and he has an extremely active and essential female ass't coaching staff. So, it's not like men are proven better coaches or program builders.
So why is this happening?